Hello,
I've tried both methods so far. Both have not worked. With the second method, the BHZ hamiltonian doesn't seem to be compatible as it gets an error with 'sympify'.The first method doesn't work when I call the "apply_peierls_to_template" function. It gives an error saying 'operator' is not defined. I'm not sure what 'operator.mul' is doing either.I'll attach the whole script.
Thanks for the help.AlexOn Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Rafal Skolasinski <r.j.skolasinski@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Alex,
The way Bas is doing it is one way of doing it - it acts on the template system combining it hopping functions with Peierls phase.
There is also another code out there that could be useful - it is however work in progress code so you need to check if it gives you what you want.It requires you however to use the
discretizerfrom continuum module introduced in Kwant 1.3.
This approach is based on three steps:
- Discretize symbolically continuous Hamitonian to the tight-binding form
- Modify hoppings with Peierls phase
- build discretized system.
You can find required codes here and example notebook here.
Please be aware that these method uses the same gauge (vector potential) for the whole system.
Just choose the approach that fits more your code.
Best,
RafalP.S. Please be aware that in current code there
phi_0is defined ash/(2e)instead ofh/e.On 20 September 2017 at 10:59, Bas Nijholt <basnijholt@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Alex,
The trick is to add the Peierls phase after you discretized your Hamiltonian, I do it in the following way:
def apply_peierls_to_template(template, xyz_offset=(0, 0, 0)) : template = deepcopy(template) # Needed because kwant.Builder is mutable x0, y0, z0 = xyz_offset lat = template.lattice a = np.max(lat.prim_vecs) # lattice contant def phase(site1, site2, B_x, B_y, B_z, orbital, e, hbar): x, y, z = site1.tag direction = site2.tag - site1.tag A = [B_y * (z - z0) - B_z * (y - y0), 0, B_x * (y - y0)] A = np.dot(A, direction) * a**2 * 1e-18 * e / hbar phase = np.exp(-1j * A) if lat.norbs == 2: # No PH degrees of freedom return phase elif lat.norbs == 4: return np.array([phase, phase.conj(), phase, phase.conj()], dtype='complex128') for (site1, site2), hop in template.hopping_value_pairs(): template[site1, site2] = combine(hop, phase, operator.mul, 2) return template You can apply this function to your template builder. In short, it does this
combine(hop, phase, operator.mul, 2), which is creating a new function from the phase function and the hopping function and combining the arguments.You would probably need to adjust the form of the vector potential, the units (this is using nm) and change the form of the
phasefunction.I have attached the
combine.pyscript you will need to combine the functions.Please let me know whether it works or not.
Best, Bas
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Alex Currie <alexjcurrie95@gmail.com> wrote:Dear All,I have a Hamaltonian (BHZ hamiltonian) and i'm trying to introduce a magnetic field. I believe I have to use the Peierls phase, however i'm not sure how to implement this after I have finalized the BHZ hamiltonian. Any assistance is appreciated. I will paste the code i have to generate my hamiltonian. You can find more information about the BHZ hamiltonian here: arxiv:0801.0901"""import kwantimport numpy as npimport scipy.linalg as laimport scipy.sparse.linalg as slaimport sympyimport matplotlib.pyplot as pltfrom ipywidgets import interactGamma_so = [[0, 0, 0, -1],[0, 0, +1, 0],[0, +1, 0, 0],[-1, 0, 0, 0]]hamiltonian = """+ M * kron(sigma_0, sigma_z)- B * (k_x**2 + k_y**2) * kron(sigma_0, sigma_z)- D * (k_x**2 + k_y**2) * kron(sigma_0, sigma_0)+ A * k_x * kron(sigma_z, sigma_x)- A * k_y * kron(sigma_0, sigma_y)+ Delta * Gamma_so"""params_bhz=dict(A=364.5, B=-686, D=-512, M=-10, Delta=1.6)hamiltonian = kwant.continuum.sympify(hamiltonian, locals=dict(Gamma_so=Gamma_so) ) hamiltoniangrid_spacing = 5template = kwant.continuum.discretize(hamiltonian, grid_spacing=grid_spacing) syst = kwant.wraparound.wraparound(template) syst = syst.finalized()"""Best,
Alex