22 May
2008
22 May
'08
12:17 a.m.
Hmm, 64M might be unfeasibly low. Let's say 128M. Anyway, if I did go with this option, it would probably be on one of the cheaper of these<http://www.vpsville.ca/plans>machines (or something similar somewhere else), which seem like potentially an inexpensive resource for doing offline data-munging.