16 Dec
2008
16 Dec
'08
4:55 p.m.
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:42:35 +0100, Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> wrote:
Dirk Rothe wrote:
are there any possibilities to get something like a line coverage from a xsl-transformation. That would be pretty useful, if integrated in a test-code-coverage run.
There's the profiler (pass "profile_run=True" to the XSLT run), but it won't give you line coverage.
http://codespeak.net/lxml/api/lxml.etree.XSLT-class.html#__call__
jep, I've seen that. Would be quite a task to generate a "function-level" report by extracting the template-matches. (with line numbers, respecting xsl:include ...) One would have to assume full coverage of all the conditional branches. Hmm, maybe I will try it some day :). thnx, dirk