Hi,
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Stefan Behnel <behnel_ml@gkec.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> An: cazic@gmx.net Kopie: lxml-dev@codespeak.net Betreff: Re: [lxml-dev] document('') fixed Datum: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:39:53 +0200
[...]
rather handle the lookup "manually"? That would require copying the document twice before the XSLT compilation, to use one copy for compilation and to store the other one. The doc loader would then return a copy of the second copy when the stylesheet URL is requested.
Is that the correct approach? That would really make it a lot of deep copying. If this is really necessary, would you mind if I called this behaviour a bug in libxslt?
For whitespace-stripping see: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#strip or the XSLT 2.0 spec, which clarifies the intended behaviour much better: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#stylesheet-stripping The elimination of xsl:text elements is a Libxslt-only thingy, but it's just an internal processing like pre-compilation of XPath expressions. I learned that the spec of XSLT 2.0 clarifies the semantics of the document() function (which, as I was told, was introduced in an abandoned draft of XSLT 1.1 and never made it into the recommendation): "One effect of these rules is that unless XML entities or xml:base are used, and provided that the base URI of the stylesheet module is known, document("") refers to the document node of the containing stylesheet module (the definitive rules are in [RFC3986]). The XML resource containing the stylesheet module is processed exactly as if it were any other XML document, for example there is no special recognition of xsl:text elements, and no special treatment of comments and processing instructions." (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#document) So this mechanism relies on a base URI to be known, which is not known if the stylesheet-tree is constructed from an in-memory string. I haven't read RFC3986, but an interesting question for me is, whether the *string* containing the XML, could be be treated as the document and be addressed/acquired via the document("") function. So if you could tweak lxml to keep a reference to that string, and feed Libxslt with it when document("") is called, that would be a nice solution, I think. Regards, Kasimier