Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:12:57PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
Hi Martijn
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:33:05PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I've attached the two patches. Apply the pyrex-0.9.2.1-gcc4.patch first (it does apply against 0.9.3 too), and then my gcc-4.0-hack.patch. I'd be happy to hear reports on whether this works for others!
I seem to not understand something... The ubuntu package has this patch. I'm lost...
It has the second patch as well? That's surprising as I just wrote it myself. :) In that case lxml should compile; it does on my box..
Yes, exactly this patch. But it does not compile for me. Is it possible that you send me privately the generated .c file? So I could compare...
Exactly the patch including even the names of the variable (orig_code) that I introduced? Wow, pretty wild. I'll send along the .c file. Regards, Martijn