Hi Steve, Steve Howe wrote:
Thursday, May 11, 2006, 5:37:11 PM, you wrote:
If you want, you can run the modified bench script again, and if you have enough RAM, you can pass the -L option to see if that makes a difference.
Sure, anything I can help with. I've ran the tests with "-L", and they took quite a while to perform and even crashed after a point.
I think the crash might be related to a bug I fixed lately. Maybe your version didn't have that (you passed the '-i' option to run it against the working directory version, right?)
Since I'm in a hurry lately I did not have the time to see why, but the results are attached. See that some tests results were really slow compared to ET and cET. Ex:
lxe: tostring_utf16 (SA T3 ) 80626.3903 msec/pass, best of ( 81157.4800 80631.1504 80626.3903 ) cET: tostring_utf16 (SA T3 ) 3305.6618 msec/pass, best of ( 3305.6618 3332.7984 3310.7507 ) ET : tostring_utf16 (SA T3 ) 3413.7482 msec/pass, best of ( 3418.9271 3413.7482 3415.6650 )
lxe: tostring_utf8 (UA T3 ) 37834.8396 msec/pass, best of ( 37834.8396 37970.8700 37908.7146 ) cET: tostring_utf8 (UA T3 ) 2880.5753 msec/pass, best of ( 2880.5753 2886.5763 2885.0215 ) ET : tostring_utf8 (UA T3 ) 2981.1059 msec/pass, best of ( 3000.1362 2981.1059 2988.5129 )
That absolutely looks like your system hit the harddisk. So, it would be interesting to have some hints about memory usage during these two benchmarks.
The server is at your disposal if you want to use it.
Thanks for the offer. I may ask Martijn first if they don't have similar facilities at infrae. Might be easier. I'll be away until thursday, but I may still come back to the offer, thanks. Stefan