Re: [lxml-dev] Building lxml on windows: a guide.

Hi Martijn, Martijn Faassen wrote:

Stefan Behnel wrote:

...

if someone provides a static egg - one more to put on cheeseshop.

Windows installer should be easy. But eggs? Is it possible to have a static egg and a non-static egg both? How would people choose? Should we switch to the static procedure on windows altogether? What do people think?

I was thinking about that, too. I guess all-in-one installers are mainly for new users. People who want to upgrade will likely prefer independent downloads. So, I think it's better to have a full-fledged installer and a dynamic egg. Stefan