Hi Roger, Roger Patterson wrote:

I don't know what the ML's etiquette is for tangential discussions, so I didn't include the mailing list on this email.

this kind of discussion definitely belongs on the ML. We only have one, so we use it to discuss basically everything from infrastructure to development to helping users. :) It's rather low traffic, so it's usually not a big problem if there is one mail more coming through.

Thanks for that link to the mailing-list search tool. Very handy. Also - this led me to actually find http://codespeak.net/lxml/dev for documentation, which seems far more detailed than what I was looking at before: http://codespeak.net/lxml/api.html

It's the new web page that will replace the current one with the release of lxml 1.3 (hopefully soon).

I'm not an uber-expert with wikis. I've just done very basic administration for my own company's documentation, using dokuwiki (http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:dokuwiki) - which uses PHP to serve file-system-based wiki files.

Not speaking for anyone else here, but I guess any PHP based solution is rather out - unless we find nothing else :)

I did see some discussion, in searching the ML, on moving lxml to Trac a while ago - is this still under consideration?

codespeak has its own tracker by now. Not wiki based, just a simple tracker. So I guess the decision on the codespeak side was rather against Trac.

I don't have oodles of time, but I'd be willing to help administer a wiki to help out. I might be able to put a wiki on my company's website if codespeak isn't up for it.

Thanks for the offer. But let's wait for a word by the codespeak people first. Stefan