data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cf20/4cf20edf9c3655e7f5c4e7d874c5fdf3b39d715f" alt=""
Hi, given the number of MacOS-X related "doesn't work" complaints on the launchpad tracker, I wonder if recent versions of MacOS-X still need to have libxml2, libxslt and libiconv linked in statically. I would guess that the system libraries might have been lifted to a less broken and thus usable level at some point. Is that so? What do Mac users think? Stefan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5859/d5859e89788ed2836a0a4ecbda4a1f9d4a69b9e7" alt=""
I ended up using the Enthought distribution 2.7, which is free for me because I'm an academic. I did wrestle lxml into another version of Python 2.7, but it's a real blessing not to have to worry about this in the first place. So anything that makes the installation easier is a good thing Martin Mueller Professor of English and Classics Northwestern University On 10/10/12 2:28 PM, "Stefan Behnel" <stefan_ml@behnel.de> wrote:
Hi,
given the number of MacOS-X related "doesn't work" complaints on the launchpad tracker, I wonder if recent versions of MacOS-X still need to have libxml2, libxslt and libiconv linked in statically. I would guess that the system libraries might have been lifted to a less broken and thus usable level at some point. Is that so? What do Mac users think?
Stefan _________________________________________________________________ Mailing list for the lxml Python XML toolkit - http://lxml.de/ lxml@lxml.de https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/lxml
participants (2)
-
Martin Mueller
-
Stefan Behnel