[lxml-dev] Problem with lxml-1.1.2 and binary text nodes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1c9f/f1c9f07f3f4a383db2cdf6738c88685997a2f474" alt=""
I seem to recall that Lxml used to raise an exception if binary data was put into a text node of an xml element. Was this change intentional? Is there any way to use lxml to check for document well-formedness before sending out xml? thanks... -nld
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cf20/4cf20edf9c3655e7f5c4e7d874c5fdf3b39d715f" alt=""
Hi, Narayan Desai wrote:
With 'binary' you mean 'containing 0-bytes', right? It looks like we have a general problem with passing such strings to libxml2:
I guess it would be better to just raise an exception in this case, however, that would require us to walk through all characters of strings that we get passed. Not sure it's worth it. Any comments? Stefan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cf20/4cf20edf9c3655e7f5c4e7d874c5fdf3b39d715f" alt=""
Stefan Behnel wrote:
This is now caught by lxml. You will get an AssertionError if you pass strings containing "\0" bytes to any of the API functions. You also get an XMLSyntaxError if you pass such a string to the parser (which was already the case before). I think that's reasonable behaviour. Have fun, Stefan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cf20/4cf20edf9c3655e7f5c4e7d874c5fdf3b39d715f" alt=""
Hi, Narayan Desai wrote:
With 'binary' you mean 'containing 0-bytes', right? It looks like we have a general problem with passing such strings to libxml2:
I guess it would be better to just raise an exception in this case, however, that would require us to walk through all characters of strings that we get passed. Not sure it's worth it. Any comments? Stefan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cf20/4cf20edf9c3655e7f5c4e7d874c5fdf3b39d715f" alt=""
Stefan Behnel wrote:
This is now caught by lxml. You will get an AssertionError if you pass strings containing "\0" bytes to any of the API functions. You also get an XMLSyntaxError if you pass such a string to the parser (which was already the case before). I think that's reasonable behaviour. Have fun, Stefan
participants (2)
-
Narayan Desai
-
Stefan Behnel