Mailman 3 March 2004 - Mailman-coders

[ mailman-Bugs-908414 ] www.list.org/faq.html "personalization" entry
by SourceForge.net March 2, 2004

March 2, 2004

Bugs item #908414, was opened at 2004-03-02 11:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=908414&group_i… Category: documentation Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Stratton Treadway (nathanst) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: www.list.org/faq.html "personalization" entry Initial Comment: The FAQ located at http://www.list.org/faq.html has a section on "Can I put the user's address in the footer that Mailman adds" (currently question #4) says that various "VERP" variables need to be set in the mm_cfg.py file to turn on that site's lists' "personalization" option. But, of course, these control the VERP settings, not "personalization" itself (and, in particular, setting those variables will not actually turn the "personalize" option on that site's lists' configuration screens, as described in the paragraph immedately below those lines). I believe this section should instead give this (single) assigment line: OWNERS_CAN_ENABLE_PERSONALIZATION = 1 Thanks. Nathan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=908414&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-896524 ] Explicit (non-80) port sometimes missing from URL
by SourceForge.net March 1, 2004

March 1, 2004

Bugs item #896524, was opened at 2004-02-13 09:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by unionchurch You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=896524&group_i… Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Aitkenhead (unionchurch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Explicit (non-80) port sometimes missing from URL Initial Comment: I run my Mailman admin web site on a non-standard port which I stated back at build time using the configure tool. It works correctly but there is at least one link from which the port number is missing from the URL. It is the link for which the hyertext says "Overview of all myserver.mydomain.com lists". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Paul Aitkenhead (unionchurch) Date: 2004-03-01 10:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=974801 OK, I have learned more about this. The behavior comes about when generating the "Overvew" link as I mentioned when I first logged the bug report. The hypertest link is made by calling Mailman/Utils/ScriptURL(), which calls Mailman/Utils.py/get_domain(), which looks for an OS environment variable SERVER_PORT. The routine is probably relying on Apache to set SERVER_PORT as an enviornment variable in the cgi-bin execution process and it s not happening. Wouldn't it be better to just rely on DEFAULT_URL_HOST in Defaults.py ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=896524&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-907272 ] URL given in UPGRADING no longer valid
by SourceForge.net March 1, 2004

March 1, 2004

Bugs item #907272, was opened at 2004-02-29 23:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nathanst You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=907272&group_i… Category: documentation Group: Out of Date Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Stratton Treadway (nathanst) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: URL given in UPGRADING no longer valid Initial Comment: I was just looking at the INSTALL document out of the CSV (both the HEAD version and v2.11.2.1 that was included in Mailman 2.1.4). This document mentions the URL http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2000-September/006826.html which is supposed to be a message about upgrading the list template files -- but the proper message is no longer found at that URL. I believe the intended message is now found at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2000-September/006822.html If that's the right message, it problably makes sense to give a little info to help people find the correct message if it moves again (i.e. message dated Thu Sep 21 21:59:16 EDT 2000 and having a subject line of "quick note for those ugrading mailman". (Or, just quote the message directly in the INSTALL document; it's not too long...) Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Nathan Stratton Treadway (nathanst) Date: 2004-02-29 23:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=987478 Sorry, the file I was looking at was "UPGRADING", not "INSTALL". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=907272&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-907272 ] URL given in UPGRADING no longer valid
by SourceForge.net March 1, 2004

March 1, 2004

Bugs item #907272, was opened at 2004-02-29 23:10 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by nathanst You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=907272&group_i… Category: documentation Group: Out of Date Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Stratton Treadway (nathanst) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: URL given in UPGRADING no longer valid Initial Comment: I was just looking at the INSTALL document out of the CSV (both the HEAD version and v2.11.2.1 that was included in Mailman 2.1.4). This document mentions the URL http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2000-September/006826.html which is supposed to be a message about upgrading the list template files -- but the proper message is no longer found at that URL. I believe the intended message is now found at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2000-September/006822.html If that's the right message, it problably makes sense to give a little info to help people find the correct message if it moves again (i.e. message dated Thu Sep 21 21:59:16 EDT 2000 and having a subject line of "quick note for those ugrading mailman". (Or, just quote the message directly in the INSTALL document; it's not too long...) Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=907272&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-907272 ] URL given in INSTALL no longer valid
by SourceForge.net March 1, 2004

March 1, 2004

Bugs item #907272, was opened at 2004-02-29 23:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=907272&group_i… Category: documentation Group: Out of Date Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Stratton Treadway (nathanst) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: URL given in INSTALL no longer valid Initial Comment: I was just looking at the INSTALL document out of the CSV (both the HEAD version and v2.11.2.1 that was included in Mailman 2.1.4). This document mentions the URL http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2000-September/006826.html which is supposed to be a message about upgrading the list template files -- but the proper message is no longer found at that URL. I believe the intended message is now found at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2000-September/006822.html If that's the right message, it problably makes sense to give a little info to help people find the correct message if it moves again (i.e. message dated Thu Sep 21 21:59:16 EDT 2000 and having a subject line of "quick note for those ugrading mailman". (Or, just quote the message directly in the INSTALL document; it's not too long...) Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=907272&group_i…

1 0