Mailman-coders July 2006

mailman-coders@python.org

1 participants
24 discussions

[ mailman-Patches-1520343 ] FIX: Inputs are imcompletely escaped & saved (2.1 & 2.2)

by SourceForge.net

Patches item #1520343, was opened at 2006-07-11 13:34 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ikedasoji You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1520343&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Web UI Group: Mailman 2.2 / 3.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: ikedasoji (ikedasoji) >Assigned to: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) >Summary: FIX: Inputs are imcompletely escaped & saved (2.1 & 2.2) Initial Comment: Inputs on admin pages are imcompletely escaped, then the escaped values are saved (excpet 'info' property). This expedient solution have caused following problems: o Input including `"' breaks HTML formatting. o `<' is not allowed in admin/user option value (it is replaced with '<' in many contexts). o 'info' in admin page might break HTML formatting with some sort of tags (e.g. '</textarea>'). This patch solve these problems. Always unescaped value is saved (except '<script>' in 'info') and escaped only when it is displayed as HTML. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1520343&group_…

14 years, 9 months

[ mailman-Patches-1520343 ] Inputs are imcompletely escaped & saved (2.1 & 2.2)

by SourceForge.net

Patches item #1520343, was opened at 2006-07-11 13:34 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ikedasoji You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1520343&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Web UI Group: Mailman 2.2 / 3.0 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 7 Submitted By: ikedasoji (ikedasoji) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Inputs are imcompletely escaped & saved (2.1 & 2.2) Initial Comment: Inputs on admin pages are imcompletely escaped, then the escaped values are saved (excpet 'info' property). This expedient solution have caused following problems: o Input including `"' breaks HTML formatting. o `<' is not allowed in admin/user option value (it is replaced with '<' in many contexts). o 'info' in admin page might break HTML formatting with some sort of tags (e.g. '</textarea>'). This patch solve these problems. Always unescaped value is saved (except '<script>' in 'info') and escaped only when it is displayed as HTML. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1520343&group_…

14 years, 9 months

[ mailman-Patches-1520343 ] Inputs are imcompletely escaped & saved (2.1 & 2.2)

by SourceForge.net

Patches item #1520343, was opened at 2006-07-11 13:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1520343&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Web UI Group: Mailman 2.2 / 3.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: ikedasoji (ikedasoji) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Inputs are imcompletely escaped & saved (2.1 & 2.2) Initial Comment: Inputs on admin pages are imcompletely escaped, then the escaped values are saved (excpet 'info' property). This expedient solution have caused following problems: o Input including `"' breaks HTML formatting. o `<' is not allowed in admin/user option value (it is replaced with '<' in many contexts). o 'info' in admin page might break HTML formatting with some sort of tags (e.g. '</textarea>'). This patch solve these problems. Always unescaped value is saved (except '<script>' in 'info') and escaped only when it is displayed as HTML. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1520343&group_…

14 years, 9 months

[ mailman-Bugs-1519881 ] lost messages risk with contrib/mm-handler

by SourceForge.net

Bugs item #1519881, was opened at 2006-07-10 10:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1519881&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Barrett (ppsys) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lost messages risk with contrib/mm-handler Initial Comment: As far as I am aware, this bug is present in all versions of the contributed sendmail mailer contrib/mm-handler The Perl code in subversion /trunk/mailman/contrib/mm-handler contains the following fragment: $wrapper = new FileHandle "|$MMWRAPPER $cmd $list"; if (!defined($wrapper)) { ## Defer? print STDERR "$0: cannot exec ", "\"$MMWRAPPER $cmd $list\": deferring\n"; exit (-1); } # Don't need these without the "n" flag on the mailer def.... #$date = &mboxdate(time); #$wrapper->print ("From $sender $date\n"); # ...because we use these instead. $from_ = <STDIN>; $wrapper->print ($from_); $wrapper->print ("X-Mailman-Handler: $VERSION\n"); while (<STDIN>) { $wrapper->print ($_); } close($wrapper); This is the code that actually hands off the message from sendmail to the mailman wrapper. I note that it still has the problem which the original author, David Champion <dgc(a)uchicago.edu>, was made aware some years ago. The Perl code fails to check the value returned by the close($wrapper). As the FileHandle being closed is a pipe, the close operation returns the status value returned by the Mailman wrapper at the far end of the pipe. This value should be checked. Not checking this status value means that if the mailman wrapper fails to successfully enqueue the message for any reason this is not detected by the sendmail mailer. Meanwhile, the mailer blithely tells sendmail that the message was successfully delivered. The likely consequence is that the message will be silently lost. Adding a test after: close($wrapper); such as: close($wrapper); die "Mailman delivery wrapper failed" if $?; nods in the direction of correcting the problem. I leave aside suggestions that more appropriate, mail related, return code values might sensibly be used by this sendmail mailer, amongst other things. btw: this risk is not theoretical. Some years ago it caused the only loss of messages by our Mailman system that we have experienced. We initially fixed, then replaced with a python implementation and finally ceased all use of this type of sendmail mailer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1519881&group_…

14 years, 9 months

[ mailman-Feature Requests-1469343 ] Per-user Reply-To mungling for sent mails

by SourceForge.net

Feature Requests item #1469343, was opened at 2006-04-12 15:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cras You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1469343&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timo Sirainen (cras) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Per-user Reply-To mungling for sent mails Initial Comment: This feature request isn't the same as the existing ones about per-user reply-to mungling (eg. 788314). I like the ability for users to be able to select if they want to get both private and list replies (highly useful in big traffic lists) or only list replies (if you're going to read all the mails in the list anyway). Now this is already possible assuming that everyone hits Reply-to-all, which I think is what most people do. However for those who want only the list replies, they need to set "Reply-To: list" header for their own mails. This is impossible or difficult to configure to be automatic in most email clients. So, a user-specific option to specify if the Reply-To header should be added to mails the user himself sends would be nice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Timo Sirainen (cras) Date: 2006-07-10 01:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11334 Yes, "Avoid duplicate copies" could do the same, except I find that whole feature a really bad idea to use. I guess it works by Mailman not sending the message to the user if he's already in To/Cc headers? If this is done then those messages won't have the List-ID header and filtering must be done in less reliable ways. Also it could lose the mail completely if the direct reply wasn't received (eg. more strict SMTP server checks or even intentionally faked), making you the only one in the list not seeing the mail. And sure, sender's MUA could in theory also add the header, except there are only a couple MUAs which allow doing it automatically. I probably wouldn't have bothered with the patch for this if Evolution had allowed me to do it. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2006-07-10 00:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 Apparently, as you say, this is not the same as RFEs 788314 and 828564. Those ask that a member be able to specify whether or not to receive posts from the list with a Reply-To: the list added. This RFE (and the associated patch 1515716) asks that a posting member be able to instruct the list to put a Reply-To: the list in her posts delivered to the list members. I really don't see the need for this. If a member selects the "Avoid duplicate copies", he will only receive one copy of a "reply all" whether or not he is explicitly addressed in the reply. Further, the poster can simply add a Reply-To: the list to her post if desired (and if her MUA allows this conveniently). Finally, the appropriate reply address is dynamic. For some posts one may want replies to the list and for others one may want replies off list, and it is as much the choice of the responder as the original poster which is appropriate in any particular case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1469343&group_…

14 years, 9 months

[ mailman-Patches-1515716 ] Per-user selectable Reply-to header

by SourceForge.net

Patches item #1515716, was opened at 2006-07-01 19:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msapiro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1515716&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: Mailman 2.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timo Sirainen (cras) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Per-user selectable Reply-to header Initial Comment: Feature request 1469343 explains this. Having the field remembered in listinfo page causes most of the changes and I think it's missing some backwards compatibility checks for the pending requests in database. I'd be happy to have it just in the options page too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2006-07-09 17:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 See my comment to RFE 1469343 - https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1469343&group_id=… ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1515716&group_…

14 years, 9 months

[ mailman-Feature Requests-1469343 ] Per-user Reply-To mungling for sent mails

by SourceForge.net

Feature Requests item #1469343, was opened at 2006-04-12 08:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msapiro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1469343&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timo Sirainen (cras) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Per-user Reply-To mungling for sent mails Initial Comment: This feature request isn't the same as the existing ones about per-user reply-to mungling (eg. 788314). I like the ability for users to be able to select if they want to get both private and list replies (highly useful in big traffic lists) or only list replies (if you're going to read all the mails in the list anyway). Now this is already possible assuming that everyone hits Reply-to-all, which I think is what most people do. However for those who want only the list replies, they need to set "Reply-To: list" header for their own mails. This is impossible or difficult to configure to be automatic in most email clients. So, a user-specific option to specify if the Reply-To header should be added to mails the user himself sends would be nice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2006-07-09 17:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 Apparently, as you say, this is not the same as RFEs 788314 and 828564. Those ask that a member be able to specify whether or not to receive posts from the list with a Reply-To: the list added. This RFE (and the associated patch 1515716) asks that a posting member be able to instruct the list to put a Reply-To: the list in her posts delivered to the list members. I really don't see the need for this. If a member selects the "Avoid duplicate copies", he will only receive one copy of a "reply all" whether or not he is explicitly addressed in the reply. Further, the poster can simply add a Reply-To: the list to her post if desired (and if her MUA allows this conveniently). Finally, the appropriate reply address is dynamic. For some posts one may want replies to the list and for others one may want replies off list, and it is as much the choice of the responder as the original poster which is appropriate in any particular case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1469343&group_…

14 years, 9 months

[ mailman-Bugs-1518281 ] Bad Content-Disposition breaks senddigest

by SourceForge.net

Bugs item #1518281, was opened at 2006-07-06 10:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msapiro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1518281&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philip Crotwell (crotwell) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Bad Content-Disposition breaks senddigest Initial Comment: We are using the default mailman on mac osx server 10.3 which is mailman 2.1.2, so this may be old. But just in case, we got an email with attachement that caused mailman to croak in senddigest. Here is the output of running it by hand. I added 2 prints to see what the offending filename variable had in it. The Content-Disposition headers are below. Note that the two parts of the filename have been joined, but because of the bizarre endquoting in filename*0, there is an embedded \n\t. We fixed this locally by editing the mbox to change the offending filename to be shorter and not split into two parts, but it might be nice if mailman would check for illegal characters embedded in filenames? In addition to senddigest croaking, all emails after this bad one were not added to the archive. Luckily we had made a copy of digest.mbox before running senddigest manually and were able to manually add the lost emails to the archive mbox. roo:/usr/share/mailman root# python -S cron/senddigests -l chair-archive (None, None, 'Outside Professional Activities GS Policy_4-22-03 rev\n\t5-16-05.doc') (None, None, 'Outside Professional Activities GS Policy_4-22-03 rev\n\t5-16-05.doc') Traceback (most recent call last): File "cron/senddigests", line 94, in ? main() File "cron/senddigests", line 86, in main mlist.send_digest_now() File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/Digester.py", line 60, in send_digest_now ToDigest.send_digests(self, mboxfp) File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/ToDigest.py", line 130, in send_digests send_i18n_digests(mlist, mboxfp) File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/ToDigest.py", line 303, in send_i18n_digests msg = scrubber(mlist, msg) File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/Scrubber.py", line 257, in process url = save_attachment(mlist, part, dir) File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/Scrubber.py", line 348, in save_attachment fnext = os.path.splitext(msg.get_filename(''))[1] File "/usr/share/mailman/pythonlib/email/Message.py", line 709, in get_filename return unicode(newvalue[2], newvalue[0]) TypeError: unicode() argument 2 must be string, not None --Apple-Mail-5-348793981 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: application/msword; x-unix-mode=0666; name="Outside Professional Activities GS Policy_4-22-03 rev 5-16-05.doc" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="Outside Professional Activities GS Policy_4-22-03 rev 5-16-05.do"; filename*1=c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2006-07-07 18:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 >We fixed this locally by editing the mbox to change the >offending filename to be shorter and not split into two >parts, but it might be nice if mailman would check for >illegal characters embedded in filenames? I'm not sure if it is clear from my first comment, but the cause of this exception (bug) was the RFC2231 splitting, not the '\n\t' from header folding. Also, in later Mailman versions, Scrubber is much more robust against bad characters/encodings in filenames. >In addition to senddigest croaking, all emails after >this bad one were not added to the archive. Luckily we >had made a copy of digest.mbox before running >senddigest manually and were able to manually add the >lost emails to the archive mbox. I suspect these messages were shunted and could have been reprocessed to the archive by bin/unshunt. At this point, since the messages are in the archive, you should check to see if they are still in qfiles/shunt/ and if so, delete them from there so the don't get inadvertently unshunted in the future. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2006-07-07 17:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 There are a couple of different issues here. The '\n\t' in the filename come about because the header is folded in the middle of the quoted value of the filename*0 parameter. The filename*0 and filename*1 parameters split the filename per RFC2231, the very purpose of which is to allow breaking of long parameter values into smaller pieces so that header folding/unfolding can be accomplished at syntactic breaks - e.g. at the semicolons. In this case, either the generating MUA (Apple Mail) folded the header in the middle of the filename*0 value or it made the value so long that a subsequent MTA folded it. Thus, with respect to the '\n\t' in the middle of the name, it results from a non-compliant message. The immediate cause of the exception in your case was fixed in the email library shipped with Mailman 2.1.3. The fix replaces return unicode(newvalue[2], newvalue[0]) with return unicode(newvalue[2], newvalue[0] or 'us-ascii') and makes a similar change in a few other places. The patch for this change is attached here. There is also a bug in the (in your case) /usr/share/mailman/pythonlib/email/Utils.py module. See the post at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/email-sig/2006-July/000293.html for more on this and a possible patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1518281&group_…

14 years, 9 months

[ mailman-Bugs-1518281 ] Bad Content-Disposition breaks senddigest

by SourceForge.net

Bugs item #1518281, was opened at 2006-07-06 10:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msapiro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1518281&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: mail delivery Group: 2.1 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philip Crotwell (crotwell) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Bad Content-Disposition breaks senddigest Initial Comment: We are using the default mailman on mac osx server 10.3 which is mailman 2.1.2, so this may be old. But just in case, we got an email with attachement that caused mailman to croak in senddigest. Here is the output of running it by hand. I added 2 prints to see what the offending filename variable had in it. The Content-Disposition headers are below. Note that the two parts of the filename have been joined, but because of the bizarre endquoting in filename*0, there is an embedded \n\t. We fixed this locally by editing the mbox to change the offending filename to be shorter and not split into two parts, but it might be nice if mailman would check for illegal characters embedded in filenames? In addition to senddigest croaking, all emails after this bad one were not added to the archive. Luckily we had made a copy of digest.mbox before running senddigest manually and were able to manually add the lost emails to the archive mbox. roo:/usr/share/mailman root# python -S cron/senddigests -l chair-archive (None, None, 'Outside Professional Activities GS Policy_4-22-03 rev\n\t5-16-05.doc') (None, None, 'Outside Professional Activities GS Policy_4-22-03 rev\n\t5-16-05.doc') Traceback (most recent call last): File "cron/senddigests", line 94, in ? main() File "cron/senddigests", line 86, in main mlist.send_digest_now() File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/Digester.py", line 60, in send_digest_now ToDigest.send_digests(self, mboxfp) File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/ToDigest.py", line 130, in send_digests send_i18n_digests(mlist, mboxfp) File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/ToDigest.py", line 303, in send_i18n_digests msg = scrubber(mlist, msg) File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/Scrubber.py", line 257, in process url = save_attachment(mlist, part, dir) File "/usr/share/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/Scrubber.py", line 348, in save_attachment fnext = os.path.splitext(msg.get_filename(''))[1] File "/usr/share/mailman/pythonlib/email/Message.py", line 709, in get_filename return unicode(newvalue[2], newvalue[0]) TypeError: unicode() argument 2 must be string, not None --Apple-Mail-5-348793981 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: application/msword; x-unix-mode=0666; name="Outside Professional Activities GS Policy_4-22-03 rev 5-16-05.doc" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="Outside Professional Activities GS Policy_4-22-03 rev 5-16-05.do"; filename*1=c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2006-07-07 17:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 There are a couple of different issues here. The '\n\t' in the filename come about because the header is folded in the middle of the quoted value of the filename*0 parameter. The filename*0 and filename*1 parameters split the filename per RFC2231, the very purpose of which is to allow breaking of long parameter values into smaller pieces so that header folding/unfolding can be accomplished at syntactic breaks - e.g. at the semicolons. In this case, either the generating MUA (Apple Mail) folded the header in the middle of the filename*0 value or it made the value so long that a subsequent MTA folded it. Thus, with respect to the '\n\t' in the middle of the name, it results from a non-compliant message. The immediate cause of the exception in your case was fixed in the email library shipped with Mailman 2.1.3. The fix replaces return unicode(newvalue[2], newvalue[0]) with return unicode(newvalue[2], newvalue[0] or 'us-ascii') and makes a similar change in a few other places. The patch for this change is attached here. There is also a bug in the (in your case) /usr/share/mailman/pythonlib/email/Utils.py module. See the post at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/email-sig/2006-July/000293.html for more on this and a possible patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1518281&group_…

14 years, 9 months

[ mailman-Bugs-1230865 ] spam filters get removed when changing other privacy pages

by SourceForge.net

Bugs item #1230865, was opened at 2005-07-01 03:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msapiro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1230865&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: security/privacy Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alex (ams001) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spam filters get removed when changing other privacy pages Initial Comment: Originally reported in 1020013 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=103&atid=100103&func=detail&aid=10… This problem still very annoyingly ocurrs in the 2.1.6 release which appears not to include the patch submitted. I have updated the patch against 2.1.6 and included it below. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2006-07-06 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 The bug reported in the 2005-07-08 comment was fixed in 2.1.7 as well as in the trunk (2.2.0a0). The bug described in report 1020013 was fixed in 2.1.6b5. The patch attached to this report for 2.1.6 is redundant and only adds a second test if subcat == 'spam': in the _handleForm() method definition when the test has already been applied before calling _handleForm(). Apparently, the submitter confused the original bug which had been fixed differently but equivalently to the patch with the different bug reported in the 2005-07-08 comment. If you have evidence that any bug with these symptoms is still in 2.1.7 or 2.1.8, please submit a new report with supporting information as to how to reproduce it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mantas K (mantas) Date: 2006-07-06 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=439618 According to bugreporter (and my personal experience with mailman) spam filters still gets removed when changing other privacy pages in mailman 2.1.x :( I think this bug should be reopened and closed only when it will be really fixed in stable release of mailman. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi) Date: 2005-09-20 21:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=67709 Fixed in CVS. (2.2.0a0) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alex (ams001) Date: 2005-07-08 10:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1156173 Unfortunately this patch does not fix all occurances of the problem. I can reliably "lose" all spam filters entered by going directly to the spam filter section after logging out. To reproduce: 1. Login as list admin 2. Goto Privacy / Spam filters and create a spam filter 3. Logout 4. Modify logout URL from .../<listname>/logout to .../<listname>/privacy/spam 5. Enter password and observe absense of Spam filter. The worrying thing is that it appears to be the login through the privacy/spam script that kills the spam filter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1230865&group_…

14 years, 9 months

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

Mailman-coders July 2006