Mailman 3 January 2008 - Mailman-coders

[ mailman-Patches-657951 ] Generate RSS summary in archives
by SourceForge.net 19 Aug '22

19 Aug '22

Patches item #657951, was opened at 2002-12-23 14:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bwarsaw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=657951&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: Mailman 2.2 / 3.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Generate RSS summary in archives Initial Comment: Here's a first-draft patch. Things that need fixing: * The generated RSS feed needs to be validated. (It passed the W3C's RDF validator, but RSS validators still need to be checked.) * The date should be given in YYYY-MM-DD format, which requires parsing the .fromdate attribute. * How do I get the URL for an archived message? The generated RSS currently just uses the filename, which is wrong. How do I get at the PUBLIC_ARCHIVE_URL setting? * Getting the most recent N postings is inefficient; the code loops through all of the archived messages and takes the last N of them. We could add .last() and .prev() methods to the Database class, but that's more ambitious for 2.1beta than I like. (Would be nice to get this into 2.1final...) * The list index page should have a LINK element pointing to the RSS file. Please make any comments you have, and I'll rework the patch accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2003-04-18 18:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Andrew, to get the url for the archived message use mlist.GetBaseArchiveURL(), which knows about private vs. public archives, the host name and the list name. From there you should be able to tack on just the part of the path under "archives/private/listname". See Mailman/Handlers/Scrubber.py for an example. Only other minor comment: NUM_ARTICLES can probably go in Defaults.py.in ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Justin Mason (jmason) Date: 2003-03-26 16:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935 big thumbs up from me too. Much better solution than http://taint.org/mmrss/ ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Uche Ogbuji (uche) Date: 2003-03-17 20:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=38966 I'd like to add my vote to this item. This is a fantastic idea, Andrew. Thanks. --Uche ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Date: 2002-12-23 15:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11375 Updated patch: * Dates are now rendered as ISO-8601 (date only, not the time of the message) * By hard-wiring 2002-December, I got the RSS to validate using Mark Pilgrim's validator. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: captain larry (captainlarry) Date: 2002-12-23 14:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=147905 Just voting for support here. This is *great* thanks for the patch and I hope the maintainers include it as soon as it's appropriate :) Adam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-23 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Deferring until post-2.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Date: 2002-12-23 14:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11375 Argh; SF choked on the file upload. Attaching the patch again... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=657951&group_i…

2 1

[ mailman-Feature Requests-1881853 ] Increasing the Maximum lenght of message body.
by SourceForge.net 29 Jan '08

29 Jan '08

Feature Requests item #1881853, was opened at 2008-01-29 06:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msapiro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1881853&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Joe Travaglione (joetravaglione) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Increasing the Maximum lenght of message body. Initial Comment: I am unable to send out email attachments or change the length of the message body. When I attempt to change the Maximum length in KB of Message body, it does not appear as an option I can change. Is there a way to access it? I am looking for the option under general, but it does not seem to be there. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2008-01-29 09:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 Originator: NO If your Mailman is provided by your hosting provider, I suspect that they removed the ability for list owners to set max_message_size for their own reasons. This is in issue you need to take up with your provider. If this is your own Mailman installation, whatever Mailman you have installed has been modified to remove this setting. I recommend upgrading to the latest version from SourceForge. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Travaglione (joetravaglione) Date: 2008-01-29 08:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1994980 Originator: YES I only see 6 settings in the additional settings at the bottom. The following options can be changed: 1. Emergency moderation of all list traffic 2. Default options for new members joining this list 3. (Administrivia filter) Check postings and intercept ones that seem to be administrative requests? 4. Host name this list prefers for email. 5. Should messages from this mailing list include the RFC 2369 (i.e. List-*) headers? Yes is highly recommended. 6. Should postings include the List-Post: header? There are no other options for changing the size? Do I have an old version of listserve? Do I have to sign up for a newer version? My current version is 2.1.5. Thank you for the comment any additional ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2008-01-29 07:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 Originator: NO It is max_message_size on the General Options page under Aditional Settings towards the bottom. Maximum length in kilobytes (KB) of a message body. Use 0 for no limit. (Edit max_message_size) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1881853&group_…

1 0

[ mailman-Feature Requests-1881853 ] Increasing the Maximum lenght of message body.
by SourceForge.net 29 Jan '08

29 Jan '08

Feature Requests item #1881853, was opened at 2008-01-29 09:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by joetravaglione You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1881853&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Joe Travaglione (joetravaglione) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Increasing the Maximum lenght of message body. Initial Comment: I am unable to send out email attachments or change the length of the message body. When I attempt to change the Maximum length in KB of Message body, it does not appear as an option I can change. Is there a way to access it? I am looking for the option under general, but it does not seem to be there. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Joe Travaglione (joetravaglione) Date: 2008-01-29 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1994980 Originator: YES I only see 6 settings in the additional settings at the bottom. The following options can be changed: 1. Emergency moderation of all list traffic 2. Default options for new members joining this list 3. (Administrivia filter) Check postings and intercept ones that seem to be administrative requests? 4. Host name this list prefers for email. 5. Should messages from this mailing list include the RFC 2369 (i.e. List-*) headers? Yes is highly recommended. 6. Should postings include the List-Post: header? There are no other options for changing the size? Do I have an old version of listserve? Do I have to sign up for a newer version? My current version is 2.1.5. Thank you for the comment any additional ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2008-01-29 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 Originator: NO It is max_message_size on the General Options page under Aditional Settings towards the bottom. Maximum length in kilobytes (KB) of a message body. Use 0 for no limit. (Edit max_message_size) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1881853&group_…

1 0

[ mailman-Feature Requests-1881853 ] Increasing the Maximum lenght of message body.
by SourceForge.net 29 Jan '08

29 Jan '08

Feature Requests item #1881853, was opened at 2008-01-29 06:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by msapiro You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1881853&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Joe Travaglione (joetravaglione) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Increasing the Maximum lenght of message body. Initial Comment: I am unable to send out email attachments or change the length of the message body. When I attempt to change the Maximum length in KB of Message body, it does not appear as an option I can change. Is there a way to access it? I am looking for the option under general, but it does not seem to be there. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Date: 2008-01-29 07:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1123998 Originator: NO It is max_message_size on the General Options page under Aditional Settings towards the bottom. Maximum length in kilobytes (KB) of a message body. Use 0 for no limit. (Edit max_message_size) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1881853&group_…

1 0

[ mailman-Feature Requests-1881853 ] Increasing the Maximum lenght of message body.
by SourceForge.net 29 Jan '08

29 Jan '08

Feature Requests item #1881853, was opened at 2008-01-29 09:59 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1881853&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Joe Travaglione (joetravaglione) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Increasing the Maximum lenght of message body. Initial Comment: I am unable to send out email attachments or change the length of the message body. When I attempt to change the Maximum length in KB of Message body, it does not appear as an option I can change. Is there a way to access it? I am looking for the option under general, but it does not seem to be there. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1881853&group_…

1 0

[ mailman-Patches-1879680 ] Danish translation update for 2.1.10b
by SourceForge.net 26 Jan '08

26 Jan '08

Patches item #1879680, was opened at 2008-01-25 15:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tgc99 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1879680&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: internationalization Group: Mailman 2.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Tom G. Christensen (tgc99) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Danish translation update for 2.1.10b Initial Comment: Here's an update for the danish translation. The work was done against the 2.1 maintenance branch and the diff created with bzr diff -p1 -r1034. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tom G. Christensen (tgc99) Date: 2008-01-26 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1159458 Originator: YES No it is not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2008-01-25 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Originator: NO Is the branch publicly available? I'd like to see if I can bzr merge it! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1879680&group_…

1 0

[ mailman-Patches-1879680 ] Danish translation update for 2.1.10b
by SourceForge.net 25 Jan '08

25 Jan '08

Patches item #1879680, was opened at 2008-01-25 09:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bwarsaw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1879680&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: internationalization Group: Mailman 2.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Tom G. Christensen (tgc99) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Danish translation update for 2.1.10b Initial Comment: Here's an update for the danish translation. The work was done against the 2.1 maintenance branch and the diff created with bzr diff -p1 -r1034. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2008-01-25 10:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Originator: NO Is the branch publicly available? I'd like to see if I can bzr merge it! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1879680&group_…

1 0

[ mailman-Patches-1879680 ] Danish translation update for 2.1.10b
by SourceForge.net 25 Jan '08

25 Jan '08

Patches item #1879680, was opened at 2008-01-25 15:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1879680&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: internationalization Group: Mailman 2.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Tom G. Christensen (tgc99) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Danish translation update for 2.1.10b Initial Comment: Here's an update for the danish translation. The work was done against the 2.1 maintenance branch and the diff created with bzr diff -p1 -r1034. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1879680&group_…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-1879338 ] catch invalid URLs
by SourceForge.net 24 Jan '08

24 Jan '08

Bugs item #1879338, was opened at 2008-01-25 08:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1879338&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: jidanni (jidanni) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: catch invalid URLs Initial Comment: One finds one can use URLs like http://lists.example.org/admin.cgi/zzz-example.org/zzz/add/vvv/dddd and still visit the administration pages as if one typed in a correct URL. Somewhere in Mailman, something is not checking the URL beyond a certain length or segment. You might say "so what?", but if you allow these to work, soon all kinds of people's typos will end up in documents as being the URL to use to do various tasks, just because they happened to work that day. (Yes, the above example does not bypass password checks.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1879338&group_…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-1866486 ] validate HTML and email produced
by SourceForge.net 23 Jan '08

23 Jan '08

Bugs item #1866486, was opened at 2008-01-08 10:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jidanni You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1866486&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Web/CGI Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: jidanni (jidanni) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: validate HTML and email produced Initial Comment: In your test suite add for all languages for all HTML pages run them thru a HTML validator for all administrative email sent run them thru e.g., SpamAssassin, to detect SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING etc. embarrassment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: jidanni (jidanni) Date: 2008-01-24 10:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1971011 Originator: YES Can't find the button to merge this with 1861600. Perhaps I don't have javascript turned on. Anyway: I did see http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Summer+of+Code but he's got it all wrong. Instead of going the javascript direction, he should just go to the strict.dtd direction. Using not even one TABLE, only H1 H2, etc. Indeed just like the HTML in my http://jidanni.org/ . I mean if anything, the number of buttons and choices on the Mailman web interface should shrink, not grow. Therefore the slightly looser H1 H2 etc. instead of TABLEs will not be too big anyway. I don't even see the need for any CSS. Just H2 or <DL><DT><DD><P> lists of questions and answers (item names and their choices.) Mailman is not some multimedia application. You should go the Strict.dtd route. No color too: then you will be forced to make your H2's titles meaningful ones, improving accessibility for everybody. (P.S., the Chinese sample I gave also has its language selector ripped out, else I would have to also maintain an English page, as that is Dreamhost's site language, and cannot be turned off (bug 1875187)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jidanni (jidanni) Date: 2008-01-23 03:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1971011 Originator: YES And as you will find your HTML is jam packed with _very hard to maintain presentational blibber_, causing a billion validator errors, meaning it is just by shear luck that people hopefully see what your thought maybe they might see in their browsers at all, therefore I recommend you forget your FrontPage Express style tag soup mess, and try HTML Strict (http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd). Never mind all those colors and tables. Get in the habit of thinking from the point of all users: _accessibility_. Here's an example of how I repaired your disastrous listinfo.html. I couldn't use strict.dtd as the stuff I include of yours isn't strict. Also you insist on sticking a TABLE inside an ADDRESS, in mm-mailman-footer, so short of just hardcoding the whole thing, it will never be valid HTML. Anyway I'm just telling you, not volunteering to help, but just telling you, that aren't these <H1> and <H2>'s easier to maintain than that TABLE tag barf that you contracted Plotzworth Whoopie Pages Web Designers for? P.S., Before making one more release, make sure what you release is valid HTML. Does Wikipedia pass the validator? Yes. It is quite bananas to just emit TAG JUMBLE GAMBLE HTML with FINGER CROSSED to people's browsers. Anyway, just some <h2>'s and <p>'s: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> <html lang="zh-tw"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content= "text/html; charset=utf-8"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="zh-tw"> <title><mm-list-name> 相關資訊</title> </head> <body> <h1><mm-list-name> -- <mm-list-description></h1> <P>關於<mm-list-name>論壇</P> <mm-subscribe-form-start><mm-form-end> <p><mm-list-info></p> <p>欲查本論壇舊信，請逕洽 <mm-archive><mm-list-name>檔案保管處</MM-Archive>。 <mm-restricted-list-message></p> <h2>使用<mm-list-name></h2> <P>欲在論壇發言，請寄到 <a href="mailto:<MM-Posting-Addr>"><mm-posting-addr></a>。 <h2>加入<mm-list-name>論壇</h2> <P>請於聚會現場報名。  <h2><mm-list-name>訂閱者</h2> <P><mm-options-form-start><mm-editing-options><mm-form-end> <mm-mailman-footer> </body> </html> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1866486&group_…

1 0