Mailman 3 January 2013 - Mailman-coders

[Bug 1098162] Re: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring
by Mark Sapiro 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

I looked too quickly the first time and thought it was strictly a Debian/Ubuntu packaging issue and didn't look closely at your comment #1 ** Changed in: mailman Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: mailman Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: mailman Milestone: None => 2.1.16 ** Changed in: mailman Assignee: (unassigned) => Mark Sapiro (msapiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098162 Title: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1098162/+subscriptions

1 0

[Bug 1098162] Re: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring
by Launchpad Bug Tracker 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

** Branch linked: lp:mailman/2.2 ** Branch linked: lp:mailman/2.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098162 Title: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1098162/+subscriptions

1 0

[Bug 1098162] Re: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring
by Robie Basak 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

@Mark Sapiro This also affects the upstream Mailman project, since the pristine upstream tarball also will also fail to build on Ubuntu after the next release. What's the reason you removed the bug task? ** Also affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098162 Title: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1098162/+subscriptions

1 0

[Bug 1098162] Re: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring
by Mark Sapiro 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

** No longer affects: mailman -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098162 Title: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mailman/+bug/1098162/+subscriptio…

1 0

[Bug 1098162] Re: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring
by Robie Basak 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

** Attachment added: "mailman_2.1.15-1ubuntu1_amd64.build" https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1098162/+attachment/3479075/+files/… -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098162 Title: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1098162/+subscriptions

1 0

[Bug 1098162] Re: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring
by Robie Basak 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

Based on the distutils documentation, I think that calling distutils.sysconfig.get_python_inc() is a more appropriate way of determining the location of Python.h. It seems to work both after and before the transition that broke Raring. Is this appropriate for upstream as well? ** Patch added: "mailman.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1098162/+attachment/3479074/+files/… ** Description changed: mailman's configure script assumes that Python.h is present in distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('CONFINCLUDEPY') which is arch- specific and not where it is in raring. + + https://launchpadlibrarian.net/126517790/buildlog_ubuntu-raring- + amd64.mailman_1%3A2.1.15-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098162 Title: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1098162/+subscriptions

1 0

[Bug 1098162] Re: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring
by Robie Basak 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

** Also affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098162 Title: mailman 1:2.1.15-1 FTBFS on amd64 in raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1098162/+subscriptions

1 0

[Bug 266821] Re: privacy hole in password reminder
by trampster 02 Jan '13

02 Jan '13

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 265179 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/265179 And now you are famous.... http://plaintextoffenders.com/post/38287749792/ximian-com-software- developers-gnu-mailman-sends -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/266821 Title: privacy hole in password reminder To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/266821/+subscriptions

1 0