[Bug 283751] Re: feature request: fetch archived emails
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75ef9/75ef953b9d20db84bfbeab61ce4fd0688a3712bc" alt=""
I think we'll probably do something like this in Mailman 3, but also, I'm much more fond of providing a Gmane-like NNTP interface to the archives. I find myself subscribing to fewer mailing lists these days and just reading (and replying!) to them via Gmane. Works great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283751 Title: feature request: fetch archived emails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/283751/+subscriptions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f7f/67f7f97f7c545b1f6419ac07d987343999b5a1a5" alt=""
This seems "out of place" for MM, per se. Providing this material is something that is intimately tied to the archiver. As I see it, the only thing that MM can do is to provide a "pass thru" conduit to whatever archiver the installation has chosen. Wacky On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I think we'll probably do something like this in Mailman 3, but also, I'm much more fond of providing a Gmane-like NNTP interface to the archives. I find myself subscribing to fewer mailing lists these days and just reading (and replying!) to them via Gmane. Works great.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283751
Title: feature request: fetch archived emails
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/500b6/500b6db67c37c4615bc60a35e5ade42e0af5ac6f" alt=""
On Jun 13, 2011, at 07:22 PM, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
This seems "out of place" for MM, per se. Providing this material is something that is intimately tied to the archiver.
As I see it, the only thing that MM can do is to provide a "pass thru" conduit to whatever archiver the installation has chosen.
I think this is exactly right for read-only NNTP, and in fact the current MM3 NNTP bridge could probably be rewritten as an archiver plugin (that's not a bad idea for someone looking to do a bite-size branch!). I think there would need to be tighter integration for the posting side, a la Gmane. Unlike Gmane though, if you post through NNTP and we "know who you are", we wouldn't need to do the verification dance. -Barry
participants (3)
-
Barry Warsaw
-
Barry Warsaw
-
Richard Wackerbarth