Mailman 3 December 2002 - Mailman-Developers

[ mailman-Bugs-658213 ] i18n problem on "Confirm subscription"
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

Bugs item #658213, was opened at 2002-12-24 15:27 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=658213&group_i… Category: (un)subscribing Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Buchmann (avalon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: i18n problem on "Confirm subscription" Initial Comment: Mailman version: 2.1rc1 Wrong language is used for the heading, title and language selection box on the "Confirm subscription" page. The list language is used, not the language chosen by the subscribing user. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=658213&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-643233 ] E-mail addresses not being obscured
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

Bugs item #643233, was opened at 2002-11-24 12:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=643233&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 beta Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Submitted By: Terry Grace (tgrace) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: E-mail addresses not being obscured Initial Comment: In 2.1b5, the archives contain the posters e-mail address even if the option to obscure the posters identity has been selected. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Terry Grace (tgrace) Date: 2002-12-24 05:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=87771 Problem is still lthere with 2.1b6. E-mail addresses are being obscured in the article indexes but not in the articles themselves. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-23 20:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 I believe this is fixed in 2.1b6+. At least, it's probably about as fixed as it's going to be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=643233&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-620033 ] gate_news should catch lost connection
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

Bugs item #620033, was opened at 2002-10-07 22:07 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=620033&group_i… Category: nntp/news Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 7 Submitted By: Ron Jarrell (jarrell) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: gate_news should catch lost connection Initial Comment: Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): Traceback (most recent call last): Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): File "/home/mailman/cron/gate_news", line 270, in ? Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): main() Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): File "/home/mailman/cron/gate_news", line 250, in main Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): process_lists(lock) Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): File "/home/mailman/cron/gate_news", line 194, in process_lists Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): conn, first, last = open_newsgroup(mlist) Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): File "/home/mailman/cron/gate_news", line 89, in open_newsgroup Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): password=mm_cfg.NNTP_PASSWORD) Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/nntplib.py", line 117, in __init__ Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): self.welcome = self.getresp() Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/nntplib.py", line 203, in getresp Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): resp = self.getline() Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/nntplib.py", line 192, in getline Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): line = self.file.readline() Sep 20 10:51:35 2002 gate_news(9301): IOError : [Errno 131] Connection reset by peer ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-24 00:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Hmm, the specific traceback you pasted indicates an error during the initial connection. I think that's about the best we're going to do for MM2.1 final. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ron Jarrell (jarrell) Date: 2002-10-22 11:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=34619 Didn't work... This comes up, btw, not during initial connection, but if the connection goes away during a gate_news run, like the daemon on the other end dies, or the news server reboots, etc. You get an IOerror on the mailman side. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-10-15 15:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 I'm applying this patch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-10-15 14:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 I didn't realize that nntplib.NNTP() can raise an IOError -- I thought it would have been a socket.error. Oh well, here's an untested patch. I think I'll check this in just because I don't see how it could break anything. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=620033&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-214205 ] e-mail<-> usenet gateway Reply-To header (PR#303)
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

Bugs item #214205, was opened at 2000-09-11 16:25 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=214205&group_i… Category: nntp/news Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Summary: e-mail<->usenet gateway Reply-To header (PR#303) Initial Comment: Jitterbug-Id: 303 Submitted-By: orion(a)tribble.dyndns.org Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:54:02 -0400 (EDT) Version: 2.0beta4 OS: Debian linux potato I'm running a plain e-mail<->usenet gateway. When someone replies to a usenet post through the list, his e-mail client sets an In-Reply-To: header instead of a Reply-To: header. This causes newsreaders to improperly thread messages. I inserted the following bit into Mailman/Handlers/ToUsenet.py at around line 82: # if the message is a reply to a previous post, change the header so # that newsreaders can thread it properly if msg.getheader('in-reply-to'): msg.headers.append('References: %s\n' % msg.getheader('in-reply-to')) del msg['in-reply-to'] I'm happy to say that this solved the problem. (before you laugh at me, take note that I never looked at python before.) ==================================================================== Audit trail: None ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-24 00:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Sigh. Very doubtful I'll get to look at the threading issues before MM2.1 final. I'll address this again after the release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-08-23 18:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Changing the group to 2.1 beta because I want to look at threading issues for gated messages before 2.1 final is released. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Giovanni Lopedote (giuans) Date: 2002-05-01 08:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=531451 What a coincidence! I had the same problem and I looked into the code, then modified it to work properly. The coincidence is that my patch is *identical* to yours. So, for sure it works :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2000-09-27 17:00 Message: RFC 2076 says nothing about using In-Reply-To for news, so it might not be a bad idea to copy In-Reply-To to References when gating a message from mail to news. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2000-09-19 12:48 Message: This sounds like the email client in question is broken. Mine for example, correctly inserts References: headers and the news readers properly thread the messages. I'm not inclined to cater to broken email or news clients. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=214205&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-621689 ] Subscribe requests dropped from admin db
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

Bugs item #621689, was opened at 2002-10-10 23:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=621689&group_i… Category: (un)subscribing Group: 2.1 beta Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Mark Dadgar (mdadgar) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Subscribe requests dropped from admin db Initial Comment: Occasionally, subscribe requests (via the web page) to a list that requires moderator approval for subscriptions never make it to the admin db for that list. They are listed in the subscribe log file, but never show up on the admin db page. Log file entries look like this: Oct 10 18:43:43 2002 (31168) eventmasters: pending XXXXXX.swfla.rr.com But the admin db page for the list shows no outstanding issues. I have verified that there was an actual subscription request behind this log entry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-24 00:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 I definitely need more information. I've neve been able to reproduce the problem. Do you think it could be related to the unofficial patches you've applied? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Dadgar (mdadgar) Date: 2002-12-06 02:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=598228 Ok, I verified that it's still a problem under 2.1b5 with the htdig and indexing patches. It's a real drag, too. :( Please let me know if you need more debug info. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Dadgar (mdadgar) Date: 2002-11-22 01:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=598228 Unfortunately, it's still occurring under 2.1b4. I'll check it under 2.1b5 as soon as the patches for htdig integration are released, as I need those to implement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-10-22 10:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 I'm going to defer this one until 2.1b4 goes out. I've fixed some related bugs in cvs, so hopefully this will be fixed in the new version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Dadgar (mdadgar) Date: 2002-10-20 13:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=598228 Sorry - I'm running 2.1b3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-10-20 11:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 What version of Mailman are you using. It's import to know the exact version, i.e. 2.1beta3, or if you're running from cvs. A lot of these problems have been fixed in cvs, which will soon be released as 2.1 beta 4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Dadgar (mdadgar) Date: 2002-10-11 00:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=598228 I just verified, by cat'ing pending.pck, that the appropriate changes seem to be in there. But the web interface never picks them up. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=621689&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-635462 ] Admin pages HTML does not set TEXT color
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

Bugs item #635462, was opened at 2002-11-08 07:13 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=635462&group_i… Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 4 Submitted By: Marcin Orlowski (carl-os) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Admin pages HTML does not set TEXT color Initial Comment: Mailman admin pages believe that TEXT color is always black and does not set it to, hoping nobody changes the defaults. And this is false assumption ;-) For testing purposes my defaults are black bg color and yellow text. And since admin pages sets bg to white it now exposes yellow fonts on white background here. Kinda unreadable. Solution -> fix template/css/whatever to set up text color to black. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-24 00:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Too late. We'll probably integrate Fred Drake's css patch after 2.1 final ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-02 11:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 There's no official css support yet. I won't fix this for MM2.1 unless someone can provide a really clean patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=635462&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-640360 ] path relative URLs with /base vs /base/
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

Bugs item #640360, was opened at 2002-11-18 17:23 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=640360&group_i… Category: Web/CGI Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 7 Submitted By: Donn Cave (donnc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: path relative URLs with /base vs /base/ Initial Comment: Our Apache server accepts path requests with or with a trailing slash, indifferently. (I understand there is no redirect.) This affects (cripples) relative paths, because http://host/mailman/private/name is the same page as http:// host/mailman/private/name/, but is different in reference to relative paths. The relative location of a month would be `href="name/2002-November/subject.html"' for the former, but `href="2002-November/subject.html"' for the latter. I suspect that the "private" URL is rarely entered by hand anyway, but FYI. /mailman/private/name/2002-November/ subject.html is OK, as far as I know. 2.1b4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-24 00:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 I don't expect to change this for MM2.1 final. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=640360&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-643233 ] E-mail addresses not being obscured
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

Bugs item #643233, was opened at 2002-11-24 16:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=643233&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Submitted By: Terry Grace (tgrace) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: E-mail addresses not being obscured Initial Comment: In 2.1b5, the archives contain the posters e-mail address even if the option to obscure the posters identity has been selected. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-24 00:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 I believe this is fixed in 2.1b6+. At least, it's probably about as fixed as it's going to be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=643233&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-643605 ] RFC2882 and / in subscriber address
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

Bugs item #643605, was opened at 2002-11-25 10:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=643605&group_i… Category: (un)subscribing >Group: Postponed Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Christopher Kolar (ckolar) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: RFC2882 and / in subscriber address Initial Comment: Reproduced from the mailman-users list. Thanks to Bill for the followup. --chris [][][][][][] Majordomo would tell you the same thing but I agree that it is a legal address (we use similar addresses internally at work) and should be accepted. RFC2822 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html) clearly allows it in the local-part (Section 3.4.1) as a dot-atom. This should be fixed but in the mean time I don't think you are going to get it into mailman. Bill W. At 09:31 AM 11/25/2002 -0600, Christopher Kolar wrote: Hello. I am trying to add a person to a mail list and having some problems. Their organization runs some sort of bestial mail system where the addresses are of the form: schmoe.j/bhs(a)dns.u99.k12.il.us When I try to drop the address in through the mass subscribe screen I get the following message from Mailman: * Joe Schmoe -- Hostile address (illegal characters) My guess is that the / is getting parsed by Mm as an attempt to reference a file (a la majordomo). Is there a way to force the address onto the subscriber list? It is an actual valid address for delivery. Thanks in advance, --chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-24 00:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 I agree that any RFC 2822 legal address should be allowed by Mailman. This won't get fixed for MM2.1, but I'll keep it open so we can address it in MM3.0. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=643605&group_i…

1 0

[ mailman-Bugs-630497 ] Traceback in error file
by noreply＠sourceforge.net Dec. 24, 2002

Dec. 24, 2002

Bugs item #630497, was opened at 2002-10-29 09:41 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=630497&group_i… Category: bounce detection Group: 2.1 beta >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Andy Carpenter (acarpenter) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Traceback in error file Initial Comment: Since I upgraded to 2.1b4, I have started to get the following tracebacks in the error log file. It is a characteristics of our busiest mail list that many of the posts come from the far east with unicode characters in their subject line. Oct 29 14:19:35 2002 (26533) Uncaught runner exception: ASCII decoding error: or dinal not in range(128) Oct 29 14:19:35 2002 (26533) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 105, in _oneloop self._onefile(msg, msgdata) File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/Runner.py", line 154, in _onefile keepqueued = self._dispose(mlist, msg, msgdata) File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/IncomingRunner.py" , line 129, in _dispo se status = self._dopipeline(mlist, msg, msgdata, pipeline) File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Queue/IncomingRunner.py" , line 167, in _dopip eline mlist.BounceMessage(msg, msgdata, e) File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Bouncer.py", line 273, in BounceMessage lang=self.preferred_language) File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Message.py", line 203, in __init__ self['Subject'] = Header(subject, charset, header_name='Subject') File "/usr/local/mailman/pythonlib/email/Header.py", line 164, in __init__ self.append(s, charset) File "/usr/local/mailman/pythonlib/email/Header.py", line 230, in append ustr = unicode(s, incodec) UnicodeError: ASCII decoding error: ordinal not in range (128) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-24 00:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 There have been lots of related fixes in 2.1b6 (and in cvs), so it would be good to know whether upgrading fixes the problem. If not, please un-pend this bug report and attach (not paste) one of the offending messages so I can try to reproduce it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=630497&group_i…

1 0