Mailman 3 May 2003 - Mailman-Developers

Bounce removal parameters default values
by Greg Stark Oct. 23, 2003

Oct. 23, 2003

I find I am being removed from mailman mailing lists left and right. I believe the default values for the bounce removal should be reconsidered. It's possible that you haven't had many users in my situation and so haven't really had a chance to tune these parameters on the low end yet. But they clearly aren't working for me at a few sites. My particular situation is that my site has seen fit to filter viruses by refusing delivery. This causes a bounce from the remote MTA every time someone sends me an Outlook virus. Why my site administrators felt this was necessary is a question for another day, it's not like I use Outlook or like my spam filters wouldn't have thrown these messages away anyways, but whatever. The net result is that some small fraction of messages to me bounce and list management software notices this. The only reason I became aware of the problem was because ezmlm also does this type of processing but it sends a warning message before removing users. It only removes you if the warning message itself bounces. In fact it sends two such warning messages and only removes the user if *both* bounce. This provides the user with a chance to react to the first message and fix the problem -- if they ever see the message. I could beg for a similar feature in mailman, but I'm not sure it's necessary. But I am sure it's necessary to tune the bounce processing parameters. The relatively few bounces I'm generating shouldn't be causing me to get removed when all the real messages are being delivered fine. It seems the legitimate messages that are correctly delivered should reset the count of bounces to 0. Reading the source it seems it has to see DEFAULT_MAX_POSTS_BETWEEN_BOUNCES such legitimate posts between messages. I'm fairly convinced this parameter should always be 0. If any successful delivery occurs the user should never be removed due to bounces. What I don't understand is how DEFAULT_MAX_POSTS_BETWEEN_BOUNCES relates to the parameters I see in the admin. None of the parameters in the admin corresponds to this. How is it calculated? -- greg

6 15

Re: [Mailman-checkins] mailman3 README.txt, NONE, 3.0
by Jeff Waugh Sept. 9, 2003

Sept. 9, 2003

<quote who="bwarsaw(a)users.sourceforge.net"> > --- NEW FILE: README.txt --- > This is a very rough work in progress. All Mailman 3.x work will > occur in this directory under the top level CVS repository. Because I > intend to reorganize the source tree, I think it's just better to > start fresh. This does however mean that for anything we copy over > (and hopefully that will be a good bit of code), we'll lose the CVS > history for it. It might be a bit of extra work, but why not just copy the files around in the repository? History is important! :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia http://lca2004.linux.org.au/ "Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system." - From Monty Python to ESR, by way of Al Viro

4 8

RELEASED Mailman 2.1.2
by Barry Warsaw Aug. 18, 2003

Aug. 18, 2003

[Apologies for the empty dups -- been fiddling with my email client again. ;} -BAW] I've just released Mailman 2.1.2 which includes many bug fixes and language updates, as well as support for two new languages, Portuguese/Portugal and Polish. I recommend all Mailman 2.1 users upgrade to this release. The full source tarball has been made available from the usual sites. Currently, there is no patch available, but you should be able to install 2.1.2 over your existing 2.1.x installation. See http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=103 for links to download all the patches and the source tarballs. Be sure you restart your mailman daemon by doing a "mailmanctl restart" after installing. See also: http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman http://www.list.org (not yet updated) http://mailman.sf.net Cheers, -Barry -------------------- snip snip -------------------- 2.1.2 (22-Apr-2003) - New languages Portuguese (Portugal) and Polish. - Many convenient constants have been added to the Defaults.py module to (hopefully) make it more readable. - Email addresses which contain 8-bit characters in them are now rejected and won't be subscribed. This is not the same as 8-bit characters in the realname, which is still allowed. - The X-Originating-Email header is removed for anonymous lists. Hotmail apparently adds this header. - When running make to build Mailman, you can specify $DESTDIR to the install target to specify an alternative location for installation, without influencing the paths stored in e.g. Defaults.py. This is useful to package managers. - New Defaults.py variable DELIVERY_RETRY_WAIT which controls how long the outgoing qrunner will wait before it retries a tempfailure delivery. - The semantics for the extend.py hook to MailList objects has changed slightly. The hook is now called before attempting to lock and load the database. - Mailman now uses the email package version 2.5.1 - bin/transcheck now checks for double-%'s - bin/genaliases grew a -q / --quiet flag - cron/checkdbs grew a -h / --help option. - The -c / --change-msg option has been removed from bin/add_members - bin/msgfmt.py has been added, taken from Python 2.3's Tools/i18n directory. The various .mo files are now no longer distributed with Mailman. They are generated at build time instead. - A new file misc/sitelist.cfg which can be used with bin/config_list provides a small number of recommended settings for your site list. Be sure to read it over before applying! sitelist.cfg is installed into the data directory. - Many bug fixes, including these SourceForge bugs closed and patches applied: 677668, 690448, 700538, 700537, 673294, 683906, 671294, 522080, 521124, 534297, 699900, 697321, 695526, 703941, 658261, 710678, 707608, 671303, 717096, 694912, 707624, 716755, 661138, 716754, 716702, 667167, 725369, 726415

4 4

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman password and administrative reminders
by Dan Mick Aug. 14, 2003

Aug. 14, 2003

? This very message came to me with the following header: Errors-To: mailman-developers-admin(a)python.org All my bounces come to the list admin address, set in the admin webpage, in the second field of General Options. Do you have that set to something, and bounces still come to root? > 2. Bounces are sent to the poor postmaster instead of a -admin address. > I'm not entirely certain, but I think an Errors-To: header or something > like that in all Mailman messages might allow one to distribute that load > somewhat.

8 11

Using the correct host
by Ernest Christley June 10, 2003

June 10, 2003

I've been trying to set up a list behind my firewall on the local network. The machine hosting mailman uses 192.168.0.2 as a static IP, but the world sees me as ernest.isa-geek.org, the DNS entry I got through dyndns.org. If you try to subscribe to the list I created, the subscribe button sends the request to 192.168.0.2 instead of ernest.isa-geek.org. While that works fine from here, people out there aren't having any luck. How do I make the subscribe button use the dns name vs the IP? You can see what I'm talking about by going here and trying to subscribe to the list: http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/mailman/listinfo/deltaflyers I just noticed that the listinfo page says that there "currently are no publicly-advertised Mailman mailing lists on www.ernest.isa-geek.org". How do I make the list publicly-advertised? -- ----Because I can---- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ ------------------------

2 1

Default link colors
by Tentra List Support June 9, 2003

June 9, 2003

I tryed change the default page and link colors by adding relevant fields in Default.py to mm_cfg.py. Changing all of the directives worked except for WEB_LINK_COLOR which did not result in a change. I found the offending error in htmlformat.py line 326. It should read: 'link' when it reads 'alink' Changed to 'link' and default web links now change. Mailman version 2.1.2 David Blomquist Principal, Tentra IT Solutions www.tentra.com

2 1

Browser stop button (revisited from 2.0.5??)
by Steve Lay June 9, 2003

June 9, 2003

I have a problem with the Mailman servers I run related to an issue which was discussed during the 2.0.4 to 2.0.5 transition some time ago. The problem relates to people who click the stop button on their browser while Mailman is doing its stuff. If the person in question is the list admin, making changes to the list, then Mailman just aborts without saving the list changes. Like the posters in the original discussion on this list some 2 years ago I can live with these semantics, almost.... The problem is that Mailman always returns the content of the page, which says that everything has been done, before it saves the list. For example, see lines 236-238 of admindb.py in 2.1: print doc.Format() # Commit all changes mlist.Save() The problem with this is that mlist.Save() is taking quite a while for large lists so I have to educate my list owners to be really patient and wait for the browser to finish - with very little visual cue that it is doing anything. (OK, animated wavy windows, spinning worlds, sparkly N's apart....) What would make much more sense to me (and my users) is if these two lines were done the other way around. At least the users would then understand that the system was doing something and shouldn't be interupted because they would be looking at a blank browser window. They wouldn't be told that their changes had been successfully carried out until they actually had! What do you all think? Can you see any problems with switching these two lines (similarly in the other CGI handlers)? Steve Lay

2 1

Unsubscribe link
by Tentra List Support June 9, 2003

June 9, 2003

I would like to generate a link in the footer of each email that would take the user directly to their options page so that, if they want to unsubscribe, they can do so with a maximum of two steps one to click to the page and one to unsubscribe via the web page with no further confirmation steps. Is there a script for this already or should I look into creating one? Thank you, David Blomquist Principal, Tentra IT Solutions

2 1

semantic error in mailmanctl line 255 (Mailman 2.1.2)
by Oliver Egginger June 3, 2003

June 3, 2003

Hello, this was originally: Mandrake 9.1 / ImportError As a result of a suggestion from Luca Olivetti (Mandrake list member) I think now that you are maybe wrong with that line 255 in maimanctl. The original line is > os.execl(mm_cfg.PYTHON, 'qrunner', exe, rswitch, '-s') But this is a semantic error we think. The first parameter is arg0 no arg1, so you should be using something like os.execl(mm_cfg.PYTHON, '' , exe, rswitch, '-s') Here is the diff for a patch: 255c255 < os.execl(mm_cfg.PYTHON, '' , exe, rswitch, '-s') --- > os.execl(mm_cfg.PYTHON, 'qrunner', exe, rswitch, '-s') This bug breaks several python installations. It don't work for my Mandrake system for example. It is possible to correct this in future releases? What do you think? - oliver -- Oliver Egginger <Oliver.Egginger(a)dvz.fh-giessen.de> Fachochschule Giessen-Friedberg

6 22

Mass subscription failed / R-sig-QA mailing list
by Martin Maechler June 2, 2003

June 2, 2003

>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Garrett <Jim_Garrett(a)bd.com> >>>>> on Fri, 16 May 2003 16:34:00 -0400 writes: Jim> Hi Martin, Seeing the message below, I had the Jim> impression that I was subscribed to the mailing list, Jim> when perhaps I wasn't. At least, I sent a message to Jim> the list and didn't receive it, so I thought I wasn't Jim> signed up (maybe the list is intelligent enough not to Jim> send me my own messages...). So I subscribed, and all Jim> seems well. no, not from here. If I look at the members list, I only see the 6 people that have been subscribed for many many months, but not all the new ones I subscribed on May 7 -- nor your new subscription as of May 15. I'm very much startled and even shocked about such a problem -- that I haven't seen in the past for the many other mailman lists we manage here successfully. If I read the "subscribe" log file (of mailman) which tells me about the subscription it `did' : May 07 09:16:30 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "Jim_Garrett(a)bd.com" <> May 07 09:16:30 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "Rob.Balshaw(a)syreon.com" <> May 07 09:16:30 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "barker(a)medtap.com" <> May 07 09:16:30 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "fharrell(a)virginia.edu" <> May 07 09:16:31 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "gregory_r_warnes(a)groton.pfizer.com" <> May 07 09:16:31 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "luke(a)inpharmatica.co.uk" <> May 07 09:16:31 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "maechler(a)stat.math.ethz.ch" <> May 07 09:16:31 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "p.murrell(a)auckland.ac.nz" <> May 07 09:16:31 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "partha_bagchi(a)hgsi.com" <> May 07 09:16:32 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "rossini(a)blindglobe.net" <> May 07 09:16:32 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "rreeve(a)liposcience.com" <> May 07 09:16:32 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "tura(a)centroin.com.br" <> May 07 09:16:32 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "v_bill_pikounis(a)merck.com" <> May 07 09:16:32 2003 (23390) r-sig-qa: new "werner_engl(a)baxter.com" <> May 15 22:05:38 2003 (20223) r-sig-qa: pending Jim Garrett <jim_garrett(a)bd.com> 198.232.248.8 May 15 22:13:52 2003 (20630) r-sig-qa: new "jim_garrett(a)bd.com" <Jim Garrett> everything looks fine, but when I then look at the members lists, nobody new one is there.... Jim> I wonder if it's possible that some people think they Jim> are subscribed when in fact they are not. Could you Jim> please verify how many are subscribed? I tried to Jim> check the subscriber list but wasn't allowed (even Jim> after giving my password). as you see, I did subscribe you and all these by a so-called "mass subscription" and you did get the corresponding welcome e-mail (that you had appended here). I just tried again (needs a tiny bit longer when working from home), and it didn't work again -- when I tried to "upload a file" of new member addresses. However when I tried (the old way of) pasting the new members e-mails in to the web-interface form -- it did work. This is clearly a bug with mailman (2.1.2) or our setup of mailman (the web server doesn't have the same files mounted, the file I used is only available on the client and the machine where mailman runs, but not on the machine where httpd runs). For this reason, I forward this answer to quite a few other people. Anyway, the new subscription are now up. Probably you should send a new short mail mentioning that everyone can use the list archives to read your last posting and Kurt Hornik's reply to it, via the usual web interface, or very directly going to https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-qa/2003-May/thread.html Please apologize the problem! Martin Maechler <maechler(a)stat.math.ethz.ch> http://stat.ethz.ch/~maechler/ Seminar fuer Statistik, ETH-Zentrum LEO C16 Leonhardstr. 27 ETH (Federal Inst. Technology) 8092 Zurich SWITZERLAND phone: x-41-1-632-3408 fax: ...-1228 <><

2 1