![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/334b870d5b26878a79b2dc4cfcc500bc.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
4 May
2007
4 May
'07
9:18 p.m.
Barry Warsaw writes:
I propose that no matter which way we go (Mercurial, Bazaar or
something else), we convert only the trunk. Let's leave the stable
2.1 branch on SF under Subversion, but do all new development in the
dvcs.
Why not do both? That is, if Tailor does its thing well, we can cheaply have a dvcs mirror auto-synced to the svn 2.1 branch. If Mark and Tokio *both* agree, then we can abandon the svn branch. *Until* they do agree, people submit patches to the tracker as usual.
I predict they'll get used to the "pull the 'this-patch' branch from my repo @ URL" style right quick, though.<grin>