Hi all,
Sorry that I can't say anything nice on this thread but my feelings on this distributed somthing :-P is just the same as Mark's. Currently, I am extremely busy on everyday duties and difficult to find time to code. I will be able to spare more time for mailman when the cemester ends in July. I will catch up any change in the version control system then. So please feel free to select anything better.
Mark Sapiro wote:
Barry Warsaw wrote:
I propose that no matter which way we go (Mercurial, Bazaar or
something else), we convert only the trunk. Let's leave the stable
2.1 branch on SF under Subversion, but do all new development in the
dvcs. It will be a bit more painful to commit fixes across both
branches (sorry Mark, Tokio!) but that will probably be the case
fairly soon anyway, as it's unavoidable that the trunk is going to
diverge (<3.0 cough>).I'm just now trying to catch up on this thread. Mostly, I have nothing to contribute because I have no experience with any dvcs.
That said, for me personally, I don't mind learning something new. It's one of the underlying reasons why I'm here in the first place. And while its always nice to have a pain free way to get from A to B, the pain can be managed if B is a clear improvement.
-- Tokio Kikuchi, tkikuchi@is.kochi-u.ac.jp http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/