-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Apr 20, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Satoshi Tanabe wrote:
Maybe not though. Ideally, most of the www content really could
live on the wiki. We'd lose the mirrors, but I'm not really sure how much
value there is in them anyway. Radical thought: with a front page we can
better design, and pages we can lock down from editing, can www be
completely wiki?I'm not really sure how much benefit we get by making the site 100% wiki... (unless we create the Mailman Encyclopedia or something of that sort.) I see the benefit in the documentation and QandA part (because people can constantly improve and add contents to them), but other than that, wouldn't static HTML (plus links to those Wiki pages) do the job? Wikis are nice, but at the same time it seems to create otherwise unnecessary management issues (spamming, user accounts, etc).
What do you think?
The real benefit of a wiki is that the community can really
participate in its improvement and upkeep.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkgL6LkACgkQ2YZpQepbvXFb5wCgkmEO2D3JrSfoYtlCTQ8pktcr zw0AniTu4q12lq8hDTUfdCAAiMUC8bvq =AwpZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----