Oct. 19, 2001
9:15 p.m.
"JCL" == J C Lawrence <claw@2wire.com> writes:
JCL> Ergo, if a given list is configured to do reply-To munging
JCL> and it receives a message with Reply-To set, then it makes
JCL> sense to _ADD_ the list's address to the Reply-To: header if
JCL> present, rather than replacing it.VM/XEmacs does the right thing too, with both Reply-To: that contains multiple addresses, and multiple Reply-To: headers in the original message.
I'll rework the munging code for the next alpha to augment the header instead of replacing it. It would be easier to simply add a new Reply-To: header. Can you guys check to see if multiple Reply-To: headers are honored too?
-Barry