Dec. 7, 2001
9:21 p.m.
"Jay R. Ashworth" wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 04:00:11AM -0800, Dan Mick wrote:
A thing I hadn't thought about: if the local MTA senses that the remote MTA *also* supports XVERP, it doesn't have to do the expansion itself; it can simply send on one XVERP-ed multirecipient message, and let the final MTA handle the envelope multiplication.
Which would be the True Win... but *absolutely requires* an RFC for verp syntax, which will have to be extensible. No, really. It will. Take my word for it. :-)
Oh, absolutely.
*I* think that sending a VERP template, with a spot marked for the destination MTA to put the destination email address, would be the most flexible approach.
? You're talking about some other ESMTP extension then?