![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/01aa7d6d4db83982a2f6dd363d0ee0f3.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Jun 8, 2006, at 7:39 AM, David Lee wrote:
Given that I'm just about to start on implementing this, it would
be nice to establish whether this sender-related word "Authorised" is the appropriate word, or if there is something better.Locally, we need to get moving on implementing this concept.
Whilst my local code might get heavily replaced as future versions of Mailman (re-)implement these ideas, it would nevertheless be useful, from the persepctive of our users, to get the terminology agreed early on.)
Seems reasonable (I should go back and re-read that thread, but I
think I get the gist of it), except for the English-speaking world's
inability to agree on the spelling of that word. :) In the US, it's
"Authorized".
I suppose you could accept both keywords.
-Barry