--On 26 March 2008 12:14:58 -0700 Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> wrote:
--On 24 March 2008 18:07:29 -0700 Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com>
Sorry, as stated your proposal sounds either naive or insane. No insult intended.
On Wed, March 26, 2008 3:07 am, Ian Eiloart wrote:
Please, think harder about what you write to the list. If you left an insult in there that you were aware of, then you *are* intentionally insulting people.
No, I wasn't. But in case someone misread my statement regarding patent facts of already installed software as an insult, I added the disclaimer to make it clear. My remarks were entirely fuctional. Short of writing a worm, you can't fix existing installations after the fact.
So, which of "naive" or "insane" requires misreading to be insulting? Neither word has a complementary definition that I'm aware of.
Why is your patience satiated with Mailman, but lost with me? I think you need to turn those guns around and point them where they belong.
My point is that guns are not required.
-- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex x3148