1 Dec
2004
1 Dec
'04
9:05 a.m.
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 20:07, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
Sorry my response is slow :-)
No worries!
Yeah, I think I can contribute 2.2 while you are at 3.0. Looking back the design notes, we have already some of 2.2 features in 2.1.6. http://zope.org/Members/bwarsaw/MailmanDesignNotes/MailmanTwoDotTwo
May be we can go forward to requirement of Python 2.4 because CJK codecs are integreted there.
I have no problems requiring Python 2.4 for Mailman 2.2, although I would like to get some feedback from the community before we decide for sure. I wouldn't be opposed to requiring at least Python 2.3, but I definitely think we should drop support for earlier Pythons since nothing earlier than 2.3 is being maintained any more.
-Barry