what I did with my system was make the archiver completely separate
from Mailman -- to mailman , it's just another email address that the
admin subscribes, or not. Does archiving need to be integrated into
mailman in the first place? As opposed to, say, a place to specifiy
the URL of the archives for display?
and since we've never really had the time/energy/etc to maintain and
enhance pipermail, maybe spliting the code out and retiring it is a
good strategy.
On May 12, 2005, at 4:15 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Let's say that's an important requirement. What I'd like to see in
that case is a way to specify multiple archivers, register these archivers with Mailman, and then give list owners the ability to select one or more of those registered archive methods. You could even
generalize it so that the internal Pipermail archiver was just another one of those methods.