Stephen,
No, we have not had any reply regarding this request. I am sorry to hear that you got injured...sounds terrible! If you have an opportunity to give some response, it would be most appreciated.
Thank you, and hope you continue to heal quickly, Michael
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull < turnbull.stephen.fw@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
Hi Michael,
Did you ever get an answer to this request? I broke a bunch of ribs on the 14th and have been pretty useless for the last two weeks, but now I have a chance to catch up on correspondence of less than "life or death" importance.
Regards Steve
Hello GNU Mailman Community,
I am part of an undergraduate research group focusing on software architecture patterns and quality attributes at Utah Valley University. We recently analyzed the work published on GNU Mailman in the Architecture of Open Source Applications http://aosabook.org/en/index.html (AOSA) and referenced it in a paper we presented at the 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), as attached. As a part of our continuing research we wish to validate our architectural analysis for GNU Mailman with the current developers.
We would like to know if we are missing any patterns or quality attributes that may have been included in GNU Mailman, or if there are any we
that aren’t used. Any additional comment on these topics you might have would also, of course, be welcome.
We believe we found the following software architectural patterns in
Michael Skeen writes: listed this
application:
- Pattern Name | Is This Found in the Architecture? (yes / no / don't know) | Comments (optional)*
Client Server Layers Master and Commander Pipes and Filters Shared Repository Simple Repository
Other?
We also identified the following quality attributes:
- Attribute Name | Is This Found in the Architecture? | Comments (optional)*
Scalability Extensibility Performance Portability Reliability
Other?
For your convenience, we have a complete list below of the patterns and quality attributes we referred to when conducting our research. To clarify, we are specifically studying architectural patterns, rather than design patterns such as the GoF patterns.
Architectural Patterns Considered
Quality Attributes Considered
Active Repository
Scalability
Batch
Usability
Blackboard
Extensibility
Broker
Performance
Client Server
Portability
Event System
Flexibility
Explicit Invocation
Reliability
Implicit Invocation
Maintainability
Indirection Layer
Security
Interceptor
Testability
Interpreter
Capacity
Layers
Cost
Master and Commander
Legality
Microkernel
Modularity
Model View Controller
Robustness
Peer to Peer
Pipes and Filters
Plugin
Presentation Abstraction Control
Publish Subscribe
Reflection
Rule-Based System
Shared Repository
Simple Repository
State Based
Virtual Machine
Please respond by October 25th, if possible.
Thank you for considering our request, and for your continued work on GNU Mailman.
Sincerely,
Michael Skeen, with
Erich Gubler,
Danielle Skinner,
Brandon Leishman,
Neil Harrison, Ph.D. (advisor)
Reference: Neil B. Harrison, Erich Gubler, Danielle Skinner, "Software Architecture Pattern Morphology in Open-Source Systems",WICSA, 2016, 2016 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), 2016 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA) 2016, pp. 91-98, doi:10.1109/WICSA.2016.8
PDF: external: PID4110571 (Morphology).pdf, PDF [fetch]
Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman- developers/turnbull.stephen.fw%40u.tsukuba.ac.jp
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9