![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/db32238d5eebf878622c8bd2770a7d0e.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Oct. 30, 2003
12:10 a.m.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:59:56 -0800 Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 2003, at 8:53 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Chuq, do you think it would be feasible for Mailman to try to handle that 90% itself, and then only hand-off to a Real MTA when it runs into trouble with the other 10% -- assuming it could know when it runs into trouble.
I think you have enough on your plate to not re-invent what others have already done pretty well. When you run out of features to implement, then think about this. Not until.
Seconded, in spades.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.