![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e6ea3e5ffc3558c74e9f8cbf3f38357a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
At 12:20 PM +0100 2006-06-08, Ian Eiloart wrote:
No, that's not true. What's required is that Mailman provide a simple API to allow MTA developers to ask Mailman whether a particular sender is permitted to post to the list. Holding rosters (a v3 proposal) in open databases would solve this problem - at least for Exim.
That's fine, for Exim.
Although Mailman is capable of filtering on other factors, I don't think the number of cases is significant. However, it might be possible to extend the API to provide information on other list policies.
I disagree that it's not significant. If you want to extend the
"simple API" argument to other aspects of the filtering Mailman is capable of doing, that's fine.
But you still have to have something to use that API to tell the
MTA what it needs to know and when, and I don't think we can necessarily depend on the MTA authors to create that. Maybe the Exim authors could and would do so quickly, but that's not the only MTA we have to concern ourselves with.
-- Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
LOPSA member since December 2005. See <http://www.lopsa.org/>.