Barry Warsaw writes:
[Your original message probably didn't make it to mailman-developers
since it was spelled "mailman-devel@python.org" -BAW]
Thanks.
In general, I like Stephen's proposal as a way to help reduce the
ambiguity in this very common workflow. I'll bikeshed on this detail:
I think the header should be called Response-Precedence or maybe List- Response-Precedence.
Fine with me, either way. I waffled on the name anyway.
The 'List-*' prefix is evocative of RFC 2369 and since this is a list
specific header, it should probably be prefixed as such.
It's not just list-specific, it's specifically for the use of lists, not users. As such it seems reasonable to me that it would be prefixed "List-".
As for going the RFC route, I think it's not a bad idea, but I have no
idea how much work is involved. ;)
For anything related to Reply-To/Mail-Followup-To, it's probably a pretty long road. I wouldn't mind having an RFC in my cv, though. (It is *not* going to List Domain Signing Policy, though, that can of worms I'll feed to the fish.)