29 Jul
2002
29 Jul
'02
8:37 p.m.
"JRM" == Jason R Mastaler <jason@mastaler.com> writes:
>> Absolutely, but I see this one as requiring very little extra
>> new code so I /think/ we'd get it almost for free.
JRM> Minus access to a shared confirmed senders list.
JRM> This is surely better than nothing, but the shared list is a
JRM> pretty integral feature IMO. I don't think I'd use the MM
JRM> built-in support until this was available in some form.I have to defer to you and others who have actually started using this arrangement. If what you say is the case -- builtin support isn't terribly useful without the shared whitelist -- then maybe it does make sense to defer until a later Mailman version. If MM+TMDA does the job, then that's probably good enough.
-Barry