Re: [Mailman-Developers] suggested improvement for Mailman's bounce processing

At 11:21 AM +0100 2006-08-10, Ian Eiloart wrote:

It's not necessary to understand all interpretations. There are a few codes that mean the remote address isn't available. When we see any other code, we should not count the bounce against the specific address, because the error isn't related to that address.

As I said, show me the code, and then show me all the actual bounces and how they were interpreted by the code. I'd like to see how closely reality actually hews to the RFCs.