On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 11:52:22PM -0700, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
This is a feature L-Soft refused to provide.
(boggle)
Indeed.
People that send messages with strange Sender headers should have no more problems either. Another quirk of LISTSERV L-Soft did not believe to be a problem.
The implication being if I insert a Sender line, under some cases LISTSERV does something weird to it? Shouldn't a MLM override this and replace it with the MLM's?
Unless I've *vastly* misunderstood everything I've read: no.
It should add Resent- headers, but Sender: carries valid sourcing information, and I don't think it should be replaced. (I'm deriving that from RFC 2822, 3.6.2 and 3.6.6, but I've been known to be wrong before...)
Cheers, -- jra
Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com Member of the Technical Staff Baylink The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 804 5015