--On 28 March 2008 17:27:05 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org> wrote:
Jo Rhett writes:
The standards expoused by the leading anti-spam groups are what we are talking about.
URLs to (some of) these standards, s'il vous plait. RFCs (including BCPs) or Internet-drafts preferred, of course, but web pages of similar quality, intended as BCPs, would do. No Wikipedia, please; Wikipedia does not pretend to publish standards.
Here's a page on the Exim wiki: How To Do Autoreplies Without The World Hating You <http://wiki.exim.org/EximAutoReply>
UK Joint Academic Network provides network connectivity and services for UK HE institutions, here's their guidance to victims of backscatter: <http://www.ja.net/services/csirt/advice/policies/collateral-spam.html>
A talk given at a UK Unix User Group meeting. Look for the 5th abstract on this page: <http://www.ukuug.org/events/winter2005/programme.shtml>
<http://www.dontbouncespam.org/> <http://spamlinks.net/prevent-secure-backscatter.htm>
The inevitable "...considered harmful" article: <http://mayfirst.org/?q=node/180>
-- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex x3148