April 13, 2002
6:07 a.m.
On Saturday, April 13, 2002, at 02:59 , Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Ben> Either we need represent the whole thing as one or more Ben> encoded-words, or we need to be super anal about whitespace Ben> between encoded-words and non- encoded-words.
The latter. What are you going to do with encodings you know nothing about, eg, if I send a message with
Subject: =?sjt-1?q?=49=74=27=73=20=6A=75=73=74=20=41=53=43=49=49=21?=
in it?
Of course, we wouldn't do anything at all with that, regarding whitespace. I'm talking about when encoded-words and non- encoded-words are mixed together.
But I totally agree that we need to be anal; it's just hard to know ahead of time whether to encode the next space as part of an encoded-word, or as the space between an encoded-word and a non- encoded-word. But we certainly must not do both!
Ben