I think you're *supposed* to use "Precedence: list" for a mailing list. Might want to check the RFC.
On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 05:42:16PM -0500, Ken Manheimer wrote:
Can anyone say why we are not putting "Precedence: bulk" on maillist traffic passed by mailman? I seem to recall raising the issue, and having objections, but i'm not recalling the objections, and my yearning to have vacation programs behave like we want (ignoring the messages) is still increasing. So i propose again that we inject our own precedence header iff one is not already there...
Ken
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 14:34:08 -0800 (PST) From: via the vacation program murdock@psych.ucsb.edu Subject: away from my mail
I will be out of the office until Monday December 14. Your email regarding
"Re: [Mailman-Users] Compilation problems"will be read when I return.
Larry Murdock
Mailman-Developers maillist - Mailman-Developers@python.org http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers