I am definitly prepared to burn the field, plow salt into it, and claim that my creation never existed if this SA module, which from its description sounds like it does what I want, becomes a standard module.. But there definitly should be one of them included as standard.
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 12:02, PieterB wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:07:52PM -0400, Jeff Warnica wrote:
ID 840426
This is different from the 'other' SA handler as it deals with pre-taged messages. IMHO this is far more likely to be the case in an ISP enviroment. ...
Concerning: http://sf.net/tracker/?group_id=103&atid=300103&func=detail&aid=840426
I noticed there are currently 3 patches concerning SpamAssassin integration with Mailman: 534577 Add SpamAssassin filter to mail pipeline jhenstridge 2002-03-25 Open 640518 SpamAssassin handler jparise 2002-11-18 Open 840426 SpamAssassin handler for pre-tagged mail jeffwarnica 2003-11-11 Open
I constructed a similar handler for SpamAssassin which can be used both for systems that pre-tag the messages and for systems that want to use python's to tag the message using spamd/spamc.
It's behavioure can be controlled by the mm_cfg parameter SPAMASSASSIN_USE_HEADERS. It parsers both the score and the symbols (tests) from the SpamAssassin-header.
It's based on http://www.daa.com.au/~james/articles/mailman-spamassassin/ and should be able to handle both kinds of mailman/spamassassin integration.
My version of the patch can be found at
http://gewis.nl/~pieterb/python/SpamAssassin.py.txt
It would be great if a SpamAssassin.py will be integrated in Mailman 2.1.4! Can anybody commit this SpamAssassin.py and James his spamd.py to the Mailman CVS?
Feedback is welcome, Regards,
Pieter (pieterb@sf.net)