On 02/12/2015 06:26 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
So I think we can conclude that (1) individuals who intentionally use "X-No-Archive: no" are *extremely* rare, and (2) the example of these lists doesn't provide any guidance to Mailman since Mailman provides no facility for generating X-No-Archive itself.
Not completely true. Mailman 2.1.x adds X-No-Archive: yes to monthly and on demand password reminders and list welcome messages (i.e. mailman generated messages containing user passwords), but I think you probably mean a list setting or something based on list settings to cause X-No-Archive: yes to be put in outgoing posts and digests
Maybe it should? Ie, for lists with "private" archives, maybe it would be a good idea to add "X-No-Archive: yes" to the header to advise chained lists not to archive?
Maybe. I would be interested in what others think of this idea.
-- Mark Sapiro <mark@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan