Mark Sapiro writes:
As I posted earlier Mailman does not archive a message with an X-No-Archive: header. It doesn't look at the content which could be yes, no, empty or anything else. This is deliberate.
Yes, I understand that, and the fact that the code uses .has_key makes it clear that it's deliberate. I'm asking whether non-Mailman- developers have an opinion, and more important (since I expect non- developers to say "Gee, I dunno ... whatever you think" :-), whether the mail-archive.com folks can tell something from their corpus. (I've checked my own folders and xemacs's: found *one*. From Dec 1999. :-)
X-No-Archive: no
apparently does occur in the wild, if we can confirm that the semantics of this should be 'do archive', file a bug and I'll fix it.
Yup.