1 Jun
2012
1 Jun
'12
7:08 p.m.
Jeebus, finally catching up on this thread.
On Apr 24, 2012, at 01:41 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
IMHO, premature optimization. Among other things, there isn't going to be a "the" archiver-core. Mailman should provide "a" archiver-core, and I think it should be based on maildir (which is apparently Barry's intuition, too). Theory and implementation of maildir are simple and robust, and that allows us to concentrate on the archiver interface.
In fact, the prototype archiver already implements maildir storage. This storage isn't exposed via REST yet though.
-Barry