![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/746f7519ba02fb0d815e59f305c53fa2.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Barry Warsaw wrote:
I propose that no matter which way we go (Mercurial, Bazaar or
something else), we convert only the trunk. Let's leave the stable
2.1 branch on SF under Subversion, but do all new development in the
dvcs. It will be a bit more painful to commit fixes across both
branches (sorry Mark, Tokio!) but that will probably be the case
fairly soon anyway, as it's unavoidable that the trunk is going to
diverge (<3.0 cough>).
I'm just now trying to catch up on this thread. Mostly, I have nothing to contribute because I have no experience with any dvcs.
That said, for me personally, I don't mind learning something new. It's one of the underlying reasons why I'm here in the first place. And while its always nice to have a pain free way to get from A to B, the pain can be managed if B is a clear improvement.
-- Mark Sapiro <msapiro@value.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan