On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:01:14PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote:
While he reinvented common practice (a definite DJB-ism) he hardly violated any standard -- +-addressing is still mostly larval.
Really? I've seen it for *years*.
Similarly. Its penetration in terms of actual use has been damned small to near non-existant up until about 15 months ago however. Thus, on account of lacking critical mass, I account it larval.
Huh. I guess I hang out on geekier mailing lists than the average bear...
Every MTA I'm aware of that supports +-addressing mandates having the extension character set as part of the feature configuration.
Do that again? I fell off.
There are MTAs which either directly or through patch support what I'll loosely call +-addressing.
For each of those MTAs configuring +-addressing requires that you explicitly define the character to be used in segmenting the address.
None of these MTAs per se has a default +-addressing character from which the config may specify a deviation. Instead, the +-addressing character must be explicitly stated as part of the feature enebling.
Ah. I *had* thought it was standard in sendmail; I'll have to go doube check that.
Oh. Hey, Carnage. I wouldn't begin to know. I've seen Tim once in the last 6 years, at a SLUG meeting. He saw me, and hasn't been going to those meetings since.
I heard rumours for a while (semi-regularly exchange mail with Wilson and a couple old messages with Beach). I ran into Tim via email a few years back ('98?) who AIR wrote something quite ambiguous and then didn't reply further. I haven't been back to FL since 97 -- am a little curious.
Nope; don't regularly see any of that crowd anymore...
Cheers, -- jra
Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com Member of the Technical Staff Baylink The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 804 5015