Re: [Mailman-Developers] New RFC on using DKIM with MLMs
On 13 Oct 2011, at 19:21, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
The document does point out that the "friendly" approach is to put stuff like URLs for querying archives and unsubscription instructions up in the header using the List-* fields specified in RFC2919 and RFC2369 rather than as body suffixes, and don't tag Subject: fields (or, at least, have that off-by-default).
Of course, that's DKIM friendly. But, while most mail clients don't expose those headers to the users, it isn't user-friendly. And, in most of Europe, for many lists, it isn't legal to hide an unsubscribe address in the headers.
-- Ian Eiloart Postmaster, University of Sussex +44 (0) 1273 87-3148
-----Original Message----- From: Ian Eiloart [mailto:iane@sussex.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 7:00 AM To: Murray S. Kucherawy Cc: mailman-developers@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] New RFC on using DKIM with MLMs
Of course, that's DKIM friendly. But, while most mail clients don't expose those headers to the users, it isn't user-friendly. And, in most of Europe, for many lists, it isn't legal to hide an unsubscribe address in the headers.
Isn't "hide" a function of the MUA, not the MLM or MTA?
participants (2)
-
Ian Eiloart
-
Murray S. Kucherawy