data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b068a/b068a4572a20694bf1ce35c4f35793d7cf077da1" alt=""
Here's another missed bounce message.
Can't SMTP server writers decide on a standard for bounces and just use it?
Arrgh.
-- Ted Cabeen http://www.pobox.com/~secabeen secabeen@pobox.com Check Website or finger for PGP Public Key secabeen@midway.uchicago.edu "I have taken all knowledge to be my province." -F. Bacon cococabeen@aol.com "Human kind cannot bear very much reality."-T.S.Eliot 73126.626@compuserve.com
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: ua-admin@lists.uchicago.edu Delivery-Date: Mon Nov 22 08:23:36 1999 Return-Path: <ua-admin@lists.uchicago.edu> Received: from einstein.uchicago.edu (einstein.uchicago.edu [128.135.132.24]) by entropy.uchicago.edu (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA27074 for <secabeen@entropy.uchicago.edu>; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:23:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from growl.pobox.com (growl.pobox.com [208.210.124.27]) by einstein.uchicago.edu (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA27870 for <secabeen@control.uchicago.edu>; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:23:29 -0600 (CST) Received: by growl.pobox.com (Postfix, from userid 15) id 0781B7EF2; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:23:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from lists.uchicago.edu (lists.uchicago.edu [128.135.132.161]) by growl.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09057EF2 for <secabeen@pobox.com>; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:23:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from lists (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.uchicago.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA14807 for <secabeen@pobox.com>; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:23:26 GMT Received: from LEXECON.LEXECON.COM (mail.lexecon.com [199.99.121.201]) by lists.uchicago.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA14781 for <ua-admin@lists.uchicago.edu>; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:23:23 GMT Message-Id: <199911221423.OAA14781@lists.uchicago.edu> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:22:05 CST From: <SMTP@LEXECON.LEXECON.COM> To: <ua-admin@lists.uchicago.edu> Subject: Undeliverable Mail Sender: ua-admin@lists.uchicago.edu
Attempting to deliver following mail to recipient(s): <brighoff@DominoFax.lexecon.com> LEXECON.LEXECON.COM unable to connect for 1 days to recipient host. Delivery will be attempted for a total of 3 days.
** Text of Mail follows **
Received: from lists.uchicago.edu [128.135.132.161] by LEXECON.LEXECON.COM (IBM VM SMTP Level 310) via TCP with SMTP ; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 20:24:31 CST Received: from lists (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.uchicago.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA08065; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 02:25:41 GMT Received: from hme0.mailrouter01.sprint.ca (hme0.mailrouter01.sprint.ca [207.107.250.16]) by lists.uchicago.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA08037 for <ua@lists.uchicago.edu>; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 02:25:36 GMT Received: from [209.148.137.13] (spc-isp-wpg-uas-08-66.sprint.ca [209.148.137.13]) by hme0.mailrouter01.sprint.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA13278 for <ua@lists.uchicago.edu>; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 21:25:30 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 20:25:36 -0600 Subject: Re: [UA] On the structure and arrangement of the occult underground From: Rick Neal <grendel@sprint.ca> To: <ua@lists.uchicago.edu> Message-ID: <B45B62C0.26D%grendel@sprint.ca> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Reply-To: ua@lists.uchicago.edu Sender: ua-admin@lists.uchicago.edu Errors-To: ua-admin@lists.uchicago.edu X-Mailman-Version: 1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Id: The Unknown Armies RPG Mailing List <ua.lists.uchicago.edu> X-BeenThere: ua@lists.uchicago.edu
<snip>
--KAA27849.943287760/entropy.uchicago.edu--
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12f63/12f63a124acbe324e11def541fbedba0199c815f" alt=""
"TC" == Ted Cabeen <secabeen@pobox.com> writes:
TC> Here's another missed bounce message.
TC> Can't SMTP server writers decide on a standard for bounces and
TC> just use it? Arrgh.
Heh, that would be nice wouldn't it? Anyway, I'm going to convert bounce processing to the same pipeline architecture I'm using for message delivery. This should allow us to easily extend for new formats, as well as start us down the road of a test framework.
I've suddenly gotten slammed with a bunch of other stuff I have to do, so we'll see how it goes. Maybe I'll find some time to hack over Tgiving...
-Barry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6288/c6288bbc88c0cd1535f59276a5d98e728b4ac9b2" alt=""
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 10:24:23AM -0600, Ted Cabeen wrote: list members who were bouncing their mail... going on a holiday is out of the question of you are the owner of a mailinglist ;) i don't understand why it seems that with all the standards on the internet, nobody seems to have tried to set a standard on bouncing email (AFAIK)... every new MTA creates his own exotic version... not mentioning the fact that some mailers (AOL,hotmail) seem to have several different variations of bouncing mail... *sigh* i had to get that off my back :)
Ricardo.
--
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12f63/12f63a124acbe324e11def541fbedba0199c815f" alt=""
"TC" == Ted Cabeen <secabeen@pobox.com> writes:
TC> Here's another missed bounce message.
TC> Can't SMTP server writers decide on a standard for bounces and
TC> just use it? Arrgh.
Heh, that would be nice wouldn't it? Anyway, I'm going to convert bounce processing to the same pipeline architecture I'm using for message delivery. This should allow us to easily extend for new formats, as well as start us down the road of a test framework.
I've suddenly gotten slammed with a bunch of other stuff I have to do, so we'll see how it goes. Maybe I'll find some time to hack over Tgiving...
-Barry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6288/c6288bbc88c0cd1535f59276a5d98e728b4ac9b2" alt=""
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 10:24:23AM -0600, Ted Cabeen wrote: list members who were bouncing their mail... going on a holiday is out of the question of you are the owner of a mailinglist ;) i don't understand why it seems that with all the standards on the internet, nobody seems to have tried to set a standard on bouncing email (AFAIK)... every new MTA creates his own exotic version... not mentioning the fact that some mailers (AOL,hotmail) seem to have several different variations of bouncing mail... *sigh* i had to get that off my back :)
Ricardo.
--
participants (3)
-
Barry A. Warsaw
-
Ricardo Kustner
-
Ted Cabeen