reply-to in digest
2 Sep
2002
2 Sep
'02
6:59 p.m.
Hi,
One of my users is complaining because digested messages have no Reply-To: header. He says the behaviour changed from 2.0 to 2.1. Is this change intentional?
More info:
- the list has reply_goes_to_list = 1
- Reply-To: is ok for non-digest members
- running 2.1b3+
-- Adde parvum parvo magnus acervus erit. Simone Piunno, FerraraLUG - http://members.ferrara.linux.it/pioppo
4 Sep
4 Sep
12:39 p.m.
"SP" == Simone Piunno pioppo@ferrara.linux.it writes:
>> Yes. Digest messages should never be replied to. Tell the
>> user to burst his digests and reply to the individual messages.
SP> Sorry, let me rephrase: this is what he wants to do!
SP> He wants to reply to individual messages, but they lack the
SP> Reply-To.
This is because RFC 1153 specifies the exact list of headers that should be copied to digest messages, and that list doesn't include Reply-To. OTOH, I think the list specified by RFC 1153 is incomplete (e.g. it doesn't include MIME headers), so adding Reply-To to the list of overrides seems fine to me.
-Barry
7904
Age (days ago)
7906
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
barry@python.org
-
Simone Piunno