Postorius issue tracker labels

Hi, all
I just went through the labels in the Postorius issue tracker
https://gitlab.com/mailman/postorius/labels
and documented the undocumented as well as changing a couple of labels. Comments very welcome.
There are two labels whose purpose I'm unclear on, "subscription" and "ui". I think "ui" should be split into "appearance" (CSS) and "workflow" (what operations can be done from which forms). If so, I think "subscription" really should be merged into "workflow" (at least the open issue should be).
WDYT?
Steve

On 2016-06-04 1:11 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
It looks good to me, and I especially like the proposed UI split.
I think the "subscription" tag can go away: it was used to flag bugs related to subscribing and unsubscribing, but I don't think that's a super useful category in and of itself right now .
I'm not sure "rest" is the way it's currently being used either: it might be more useful to rename it to be like the wait-for-mailman tag to indicate bugs that occur due to mailmanclient.
Terri

On Jun 04, 2016, at 08:46 AM, Terri Oda wrote:
'wait-for-mailman' is just a little weird given that we use the term 'mailman' for the whole umbrella project. 'wait-for-core' is a little better but it doesn't accurately describe blockers on mailman.client. 'wait-for-api'? I'm also okay with leaving it as it us until/unless we figure out something better.
-Barry

On 2016-06-04 1:11 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
It looks good to me, and I especially like the proposed UI split.
I think the "subscription" tag can go away: it was used to flag bugs related to subscribing and unsubscribing, but I don't think that's a super useful category in and of itself right now .
I'm not sure "rest" is the way it's currently being used either: it might be more useful to rename it to be like the wait-for-mailman tag to indicate bugs that occur due to mailmanclient.
Terri

On Jun 04, 2016, at 08:46 AM, Terri Oda wrote:
'wait-for-mailman' is just a little weird given that we use the term 'mailman' for the whole umbrella project. 'wait-for-core' is a little better but it doesn't accurately describe blockers on mailman.client. 'wait-for-api'? I'm also okay with leaving it as it us until/unless we figure out something better.
-Barry
participants (4)
-
Barry Warsaw
-
Simon Hanna
-
Stephen J. Turnbull
-
Terri Oda