I noticed the message about direct smtp delivery being needed forvirtual hosting....
As I mentioned before, I have a version on mailman 1.0b1 that I amrunning that already does this. I am going to give a good shot at
integrating that feature into the current (1.0b3?) source this weekend.
(I want to anyway, as I want to upgrade my server. )
BTW, I also mentioned some user database changes in my variant of
mailman... I'm dropping those, as I don't like the way I implemented them.
I'll just try to incorporate the other features I added to 1.0b1 (smtp
delivery being the biggie) into the current tree, and go from there.
-The Dragon De Monsyne
On Thu, 28 May 1998, The Dragon De Monsyne wrote:
I noticed the message about direct smtp delivery being needed for virtual hosting....
As I mentioned before, I have a version on mailman 1.0b1 that I am running that already does this. I am going to give a good shot at integrating that feature into the current (1.0b3?) source this weekend.
(I want to anyway, as I want to upgrade my server. )
It looks like john was doing this, today, and all that will come out with barry's big autoconf changes within the next few weeks - maybe sooner - probably as 1.0b4. So you may not want to spend more time on it.
BTW, I also mentioned some user database changes in my variant of mailman... I'm dropping those, as I don't like the way I implemented them. I'll just try to incorporate the other features I added to 1.0b1 (smtp delivery being the biggie) into the current tree, and go from there.
If you're interested in incorporating the other things, you should check with barry about getting a current snapshot before doing to much hacking...
Ken
On Fri, 29 May 1998, Ken Manheimer wrote:
I noticed the message about direct smtp delivery being needed for virtual hosting....
As I mentioned before, I have a version on mailman 1.0b1 that I am running that already does this. I am going to give a good shot at integrating that feature into the current (1.0b3?) source this weekend.
(I want to anyway, as I want to upgrade my server. )It looks like john was doing this, today, and all that will come out with barry's big autoconf changes within the next few weeks - maybe sooner - probably as 1.0b4. So you may not want to spend more time on it.
Hmm....BTW, I also mentioned some user database changes in my variant of mailman... I'm dropping those, as I don't like the way I implemented them. I'll just try to incorporate the other features I added to 1.0b1 (smtp delivery being the biggie) into the current tree, and go from there.
If you're interested in incorporating the other things, you should check with barry about getting a current snapshot before doing to much hacking...
Yes. Where/how do I get the current system?
-The Dragon De Monsyne
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 01:29:56AM -0400, Ken Manheimer wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 1998, The Dragon De Monsyne wrote:
I noticed the message about direct smtp delivery being needed for virtual hosting....
As I mentioned before, I have a version on mailman 1.0b1 that I am running that already does this. I am going to give a good shot at integrating that feature into the current (1.0b3?) source this weekend.
(I want to anyway, as I want to upgrade my server. )It looks like john was doing this, today, and all that will come out with barry's big autoconf changes within the next few weeks - maybe sooner - probably as 1.0b4. So you may not want to spend more time on it.
Yeah, I got smtp delivery done last night, and it seems to be working well.
BTW, I also mentioned some user database changes in my variant of mailman... I'm dropping those, as I don't like the way I implemented them. I'll just try to incorporate the other features I added to 1.0b1 (smtp delivery being the biggie) into the current tree, and go from there.
If you're interested in incorporating the other things, you should check with barry about getting a current snapshot before doing to much hacking...
Poor Barry :) I can provide you with a snapshot as well. In fact, let me try to merge patches that have recently been posted to this list into the distribution, and then I'll put up a snapshot of the current version just for the people on this mailing list. It would not only be good for people wanting to integrate more changes, but it will be good for testing out newer code...
John
"KM" == Ken Manheimer <klm@cnri.reston.va.us> writes:
KM> If you're interested in incorporating the other things, you
KM> should check with barry about getting a current snapshot
KM> before doing to much hacking...One of the things I would really like to do, is to get a read-only public CVS tree available, so that it will be easier for developers such as Scott to integrate their changes, and stay as (painfully) up-to-date as they want :-).
-Barry
participants (4)
-
Barry A. Warsaw -
John Viega -
Ken Manheimer -
The Dragon De Monsyne