[Fwd: Fwd: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Potential shortcoming in check_perms]
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/8ce599cee40be75f496bd04d205084c5.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Well, for some reason, I never got this reply, so I apologize for the slow response.
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] Potential shortcoming in check_perms From: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: Damned Crazy Followers of the Horns X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:16:41 -0500 Cc: mailman-developers@python.org X-BeenThere: mailman-developers@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 List-Id: GNU Mailman developers <mailman-developers.python.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers>, <mailto:mailman-developers-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers> List-Post: <mailto:mailman-developers@python.org> List-Help: <mailto:mailman-developers-request@python.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers>, <mailto:mailman-developers-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: mailman-developers-bounces+web=3dresearch.com@python.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at 3dresearch.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on dorabella.3dresearch.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Sanitizer: 3D RESEARCH Anomy mail filter
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 11:52, Bill Moran wrote:
So, I was wondering what people thought about updating the check_perms script to check file ownerships as well. Is is possible? It sure seems like it would be helpful!
check_perms checks group ownership. Can you provide more detail about what was broken, and specifically what files needed to be checked?
Unfortunately, I don't know. It was one of those situations where a production list server was offline and multiple people were working on it.
I do know, for a fact, that at one point check_perms was saying that everything was OK, and yet we could not access the list archives. I know that's almost no help at all, but file it away in case it seems to happen again with someone who's capable of getting you useful details. The symptoms were, specifically, that when accessing the list archives, all links linked to the same message.
I'm going to try to do some post-chaos investigation on the problem next week. If I find anything of use about what went wrong and why, I'll pass it on.
I apologize for complaining without having enough details to helpful.
-- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/01aa7d6d4db83982a2f6dd363d0ee0f3.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 10:07, Bill Moran wrote:
I do know, for a fact, that at one point check_perms was saying that everything was OK, and yet we could not access the list archives. I know that's almost no help at all, but file it away in case it seems to happen again with someone who's capable of getting you useful details. The symptoms were, specifically, that when accessing the list archives, all links linked to the same message.
I'm going to try to do some post-chaos investigation on the problem next week. If I find anything of use about what went wrong and why, I'll pass it on.
I apologize for complaining without having enough details to helpful.
No problem, thanks for the response. I'll keep an eye out and do let me know if you get any more information.
-Barry
participants (2)
-
Barry Warsaw
-
Bill Moran