[originally posted to -users, but I figured -developers is probably a better forum for it]

I mentioned this once before and the general response I got was "it uses them for loop detection, so it leaves them alone", but for anonymous lists (especially ones dealing with sensitive subjects) those received headers can easily give away the identity of the person sending the message, which is a Bad Thing.

The X-Been-There flag SHOULD be catching looping, so I'm not worried if this "loop detection of last resort" is removed.

This really (IMHO) should be there if we want to be able to consider anonymous lists anonymous. Right now, they're WORSE than anonymous because they give the ILLUSION of anonymity. :(

Any thoughts on how this could be done? I'm not a python guy by trade, so I'm sorta lost trying to find where the anonymization takes place to begin with. :)

D

+---------------------+-----------------------------------------+ | dredd@megacity.org | "... And so it begins ... " | | Derek J. Balling | - Ambassador Kosh, Babylon 5 | +---------------------+-----------------------------------------+