Re: [Mailman-Developers] Yet another weird-a$$ potential attack problem...
On Thu, 04 Apr 2002 23:09:32 -0800 Chuq Von Rospach <chuqui@plaidworks.com> wrote:
On 4/4/02 10:49 PM, "J C Lawrence" <claw@kanga.nu> wrote:
Keep the just-hit-reply model,
How about keeping the reply model, but requiring the reply come from the address being subscribed?
Problem: That breaks across forwarders.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw@kanga.nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
On 4/5/02 11:57 PM, "J C Lawrence" <claw@kanga.nu> wrote:
Keep the just-hit-reply model,
How about keeping the reply model, but requiring the reply come from the address being subscribed?
Problem: That breaks across forwarders.
And in all honesty, I consider that a feature.
-- Chuq Von Rospach, Architech chuqui@plaidworks.com -- http://www.chuqui.com/
Someday, we'll look back on this, laugh nervously and change the subject.
participants (2)
-
Chuq Von Rospach -
J C Lawrence